This was one of the points I was making in the article. Back in the day, you can just go with one ball and "figure it out". Today, we have a bigger challenge when trying to find the ball that carries the most. So even in today's higher scoring environment, the delta between bowlers is smaller which can make it more competitive. So what if the whole league average is 220? Some will be 235, some will be 230. If we are all getting the ball to the pocket, then some are carrying better than the rest of us. Everyone who bowls on a scratch league knows the deal, "he who finds it first..." So it's still a challenge, just a different one. I take pride in finishing at the top of a scratch league because it's not just about average but about competition. So we can still make bowling competitive, even in the very high scoring environment.
Can anyone tell me it's not fun watching the pros throw lots of strikes on TV? I mean, does anyone recall that tournament a few years ago where they were bowling 160s or so? How boring was that?
Of course as others have said, if we want to better the sport, we as individuals need to challenge ourselves. I honestly believe people gravitate to what they hang around with. If you bowl in a rec league, you will likely not score as well as in a competitive league with the same shot laid out. For example, we've got 2 Peterson leagues near me. In one league, the top 5 or so are sandbaggers and the highest average is 205. In the next, the top average is 232. Same pattern, same lanes, same scoring system, some of the same bowlers. What makes it different? I believe it's the environment. The higher scoring league attracts bowlers who want to be more competitive and are not there to sandbag. Even the sandbaggers know they need to score better to win in the other league.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Everything Bowling, coaching tips, ball reviews, General bowling discussions
USBC Certified Level I