I’m a decent bowler, I can beat the brakes off a lot of people and get beat by quite a few as well. I’ve had a lot of success and a lot of failure in my career....that said, when my career is over I’ll be counted among those who was interested in seeing how good or bad I really was, who was not interested in getting away with errant shots and who wanted to know all of my flaws and confronted them head on. The group I will be in will be smaller but I will be surrounded by the real deal.
I will have been honest with myself and, to me, that’s my biggest value.
I think this is the case for most of us on this site actually. But we are not the typical bowler. I'm not currently doing it, but in previous seasons, I drove 50 miles each way to participate in a PBA Shot league and passed 5 bowling alleys on the way to do it.
I like the challenge of sport patterns, even if my USBC Open Championships Average is 176. I can and do average in the two-teens and two-twenties on a house shot, which can be fun, but it's like playing a video game on easy mode.
Which of course is what most league bowlers prefer.
This past year for example, I joined a draft league that has the best bowlers in the area. When I joined, I was under the impression we would be bowling on PBA patterns. On league meeting night(and before), there was a big uproar about how these "great bowlers" didn't want to bowl on sport patterns, they wanted their cake shot.
This was a Vise sponsored league with a lot of added money. On the meeting night, John Nakashima, who some of you may know is one of the owners of Vise and also the alley where the league bowls(Pacific Ave Bowl, Stockton CA) was trying to explain to this bunch of prima-donnas that high level, high dollar leagues shouldn't bowl in a house shot. Nope, they wouldn't have it. So we finally settled on challenge patterns instead, which if you saw the scores, weren't really a challenge. But that didn't stop many of them from bitching about how their averages should be higher.