Rackattack, my tourneys will definitely have at least the same prize funds as before, and hopefully even bigger since I'm seeking sponsors a lot more this summer. I look forward to seeing you again!!!
I love the honesty, because quite honestly, the almighty dollar means something to me as well. But let me tell you that I am not a quitter by nature (as you all probably know by now), so if I get my arse kicked 3 or 4 straight tournaments in a row and lose say, $300-$500 in the process, I'll work overtime in practice (costing me more money) and get in more tournaments until I knock that monkey off my back.
On the other hand, looking at Michigan Majors, I will probably never bowl that tournament again because I feel like I stand no chance whatsoever of ever cashing in that event. And if I did, it wouldn't be any fun anyways because it is such a shootout. If I have to average 245+ to guarantee a cashing spot in the tournament, it better be for 13 or 14 frames!!! haha. That is just too much about luck in my opinion.
To steal a line from Bones, bowlers like Rackattack are in the minority. The sport should, however, be structured so that bowlers who do want to bowl for money have the opportunity to do so, and those who perform the best on any given day will win the money, thus profitting on the day. This structure will allow bowlers to climb the ranks and hone their game to get to the level where they too can bowl for money!
90%-95% of leagues and tournaments should have no jackpots other than mystery. This solves the problem. Why does a 150 average bowler need to compete for money? Those bowlers used to be the ones who bowled for the community that I was talking about before. And if they want to get better, they can work their way up the ladder to the money legaues if they like.
--------------------
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.comFamous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"