win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?  (Read 11509 times)

Coach Bonesaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Go Sarge Easter
NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« on: October 22, 2012, 09:35:50 AM »
What's the best new-urethane ball on the market? It's hard to decide, especially when given the Karma-thane and New Blue from Hammer.
In the bag:

Roto Grip Magic Gem
Motiv Primal Shock
Hammer Ocean Vibe

 

WOWZERS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #31 on: November 02, 2012, 07:39:03 AM »
I have tried a Liberator, Hype, and Karma, and I eventually still go back to my old Stingray/C. The ball uses the same core as the Cuda/C which everyone who bowled 20 years ago can remember how great of a core that was. The Stingray/C is an amazing piece that can still beat the balls from today.

If I had to choose one today, I would try to find another Liberator...never tried a Desperado though.

WOWZERS

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #32 on: November 02, 2012, 08:21:15 AM »
Mo Pinel used the term at one time for poly and urethane vs. reactive resin as "bulldozers and erasers"  I think that explains the situation very well.

Quote
Scott,

I just want to clarify.  I note the statements about Urethane and Poly(Plastic?) destroying the heads?

More so than reactive?

I have bowled after a high rev lefty throwing plastic and the shot just got longer and longer real quick(about the only time I've had my shot affected by another lefty!).  There was still head oil but a quickly sloppier break point.

BUT, I wonder about urethane?  What does it do to the heads different than a reactive?
Scott

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #33 on: November 02, 2012, 10:30:44 AM »
Scott,

I just want to clarify.  I note the statements about Urethane and Poly(Plastic?) destroying the heads?

More so than reactive? 

I have bowled after a high rev lefty throwing plastic and the shot just got longer and longer real quick(about the only time I've had my shot affected by another lefty!).  There was still head oil but a quickly sloppier break point.

BUT, I wonder about urethane?  What does it do to the heads different than a reactive?

Regards,

Luckylefty

Plastic doesn't destroy the heads. It pushes oil to the breakpoint, due to the non porous nature of it, but doesn't wreck the heads. Urethane on the other hand, I can see.

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #34 on: November 02, 2012, 01:37:25 PM »
Now I am more confused than ever and it seems that Scott33 is saying something different from Impending.

I believe the grouping of plastic(poly) and urethane are being classified as bulldozers by Scott 33.  Impending doom says plastic is a bulldozer but leaves the heads intact(I agree with this). 

Yet I got the impression someone above(Scott33) is saying Urethane destroys the heads?

So I guess my confusion is bulldozers.  Destroy the heads?(for plastic I say no sounds like so does Impending!).  Urethane I don't know, have never been around it!

REgards,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #35 on: November 02, 2012, 02:05:57 PM »
Dull urethane can pull oil off heads and deposit it in the backend.  Poly does little head depletion but does push it down hence both are bulldozers.  Reactives especially low ball surface oil monsters can pull oil off heads and thru the lane hence erasers. 

Also why teams that can play together with reactives on flatter patterns like Natl's which riggs team is great at burn a hole and create bounce room on a flatter pattern.  Teams that play together stay together.

Read Jeff Richgels aka riggs blog from today where he is bowling league (last night/Thurs.) on a higher volume short Beijing pattern with a younger player on his team with some higher rev's using a Blue Hammer.  Might put it all into perspective.

http://11thframe.com/page/blog_id_5415

 
« Last Edit: November 02, 2012, 02:08:39 PM by scotts33 »
Scott

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: NEW URETHANE: Which ball is best?
« Reply #36 on: November 02, 2012, 02:47:56 PM »
Scott33,

Now VERY Clear and I appreciate it!

As to the creating friction on flat patterns with reactives, that is why lefties are struggling on the pro tour (and retiring) and righties are dominating like never before.

Creation of friction spots!

I have certainly known the bulldozer effect of plastics for some time(at least since that high rev lefty left me confused one set many years ago).

I'll have an update for you on that bulldozer effect and how this lefty intends to take advantage of the knowledge collected here!

Thanks!!,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana