win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: More Angular = Less Control?  (Read 6218 times)

todvan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
More Angular = Less Control?
« on: October 12, 2014, 09:13:56 PM »
My question has to do with trying something more angular - does a ball that is more angular sacrifice the control you have with arcing equipment?

I am wondering if there is a good compromise - more angular, strong finish, without being over/under, skid/flip?  Would this be a symmetrical ball drilled to 'flip' or an asymmetrical drilled with more control type layout?  Or something else?

Anyone been through a similar search?  Any specific balls/layouts that worked for you?

Thanks!
MOTIV Jackal LE .................40 x 4.5 x 40 p2.5
MOTIV Revolt Vengeance......45 x 4.0 x 50 p3
MOTIV Forza GT ..................50 x 4.0 x 70 p2.5
MOTIV Sigma Sting..............50 x 4.0 x 45 p3

 

cheech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1360
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #1 on: October 12, 2014, 09:26:14 PM »
it really comes down to specific core/cover combo on the right conditions. it will be different for everyone. for me the original eruption or nomad dagger both with the polish taken off had the right combo of angularity and control but for someone else it could be a gb2 or black widow or vg nano in general more angular does mean less control just because those types of balls are more oil (or friction) sensitive

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2014, 10:14:14 PM »
Try taking the polish off. Use all the steps of abralon from lowest to highest. It will leave the ball looking polished but take away a lot of the over/under but maintain easy length with a strong move off the spot, but with touch more control
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #3 on: October 13, 2014, 07:59:54 AM »
I would like to just make sure I understand the terms a little bit before I put place an opinion.

1.  Angular  means a sharp breakpoint, not very rounded.
2.  Over Under means to me when I miss outside it doesn't recover on a top hat and when I pull inside it rapidly crosses over.

In general I find that my more angular equipment can hit harder under circumstances where I can find the pocket.  However if there are big backends a nice rounded look will often carry even better by hitting lighter and getting the 1 pin heading to the 7 pin for righties.  Or the 1 pin chasing pins towards the 10 pin for lefties..

However on a side to side wet dry with some carrydown it is surprising to me how much I often like skid snappy type pearls.  Or strongly drilled solid assymetrics.  These strongly drilled pearls or solid assymetrics can often supply miss room from inside the pattern that allows push and tug!

They also supply hit and squaring up to the pocket. 

My observation of others that have over under is frequently too weakly drilled equipment for the condition and their rev rate/speed matchup.  Or too little surface
for the condition.

Lately I have seen a lot of bowlers with over/under with the IQ tour series frequently drilled with the pin to far from the PAP for these low diff balls.

My favorite use of these types of aggressive equipment is the side to side top hat with medium drilled positions.  Examples that are explosive but have a path to the pocket lately on many days for me are a 4 5/8 pin to pap Freakn Frantic.  Also a 4 7/8 pin to pap Pyramid Chosen Path Assymetric with a strong MB position!  This on a very harsh side to side wet dry, with slop going down in front of the pocket quickly.

Though the moves are not smooth but the necessary hit is supplied and recovery and some tug area are available if the shot is aggressively pursued! 

This on a shot many talk of mucho over under.

REgards,

Luckylefty
PS I see the Zero Gravity as a great choice for a solid assymetric also on today's top hats with surface reduction.
PPS there also other tools to reduce over under....
« Last Edit: October 13, 2014, 08:05:18 AM by LuckyLefty »
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

itsallaboutme

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2017
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2014, 08:52:54 AM »
LL,

You have over/under backwards.  Miss out, go high (over reaction), miss in, ball doesn't hook (under reaction).

todvan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2014, 09:38:20 AM »
Thanks for the replies so far.  Here's where I'm coming from on this....I have a dull asym - nice when there is enough head oil.  And a smooth arcing semi-shiny  symmetric, control drill - nice for when the backends are jumping.  Med/Low Revs and Speed matched, Med/Hi Rotation and Tilt, Left side.

The ball I'm trying to come up with would be one that gets through the heads clean like the symmetric, but has a much stronger finish than that ball, for when the heads are lighter, but the backends are not jumping.  I am just trying to avoid a ball that is super skid/flip, that is harder to control - it sounds like a 4000 surface would help with this.

What about a strong, satin finished (4000) pearl or hybrid symmetric core designed(higher rg?) and drilled to be angular at the end for this situation? 

Any other advice is appreciated.
MOTIV Jackal LE .................40 x 4.5 x 40 p2.5
MOTIV Revolt Vengeance......45 x 4.0 x 50 p3
MOTIV Forza GT ..................50 x 4.0 x 70 p2.5
MOTIV Sigma Sting..............50 x 4.0 x 45 p3

2handedrook12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1702
  • Be yourself and keep it simple.
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #6 on: October 13, 2014, 11:28:11 AM »
I recommend a Hy-Road Solid. Drill it to have a strong backend and change the surface to 4000.
League: Pitch Purple, Destiny Magenta
Testing: MVP
Interests: Black Widow, Proof Solid, Idol Pearl

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #7 on: October 13, 2014, 05:11:45 PM »
Itsallaboutme,

Yes you are technically and completely correct.

Over under is exactly as you described.  I also see quite a bit of the other....as I described it for other bowlers in places I bowl.  I guess that would be under/over!  As I had described it.

I often believe the condition that causes it is under drilling some of todays weaker cores! 

Neither condition is something I like to see when I am bowling.

As a former some form of pretty good golfer I saw the same often caused by a grip that didn't allow a golfer to draw when swinging inside out.  Shots to the right went further right or sliced and shots to the left keep hooking.  Think Tiger lately!

So it is with lack of surface and lack of use of flare potential when going to play the slot in the pattern.

If those elements are right....so fun.  Miss area both ways.  If not right....large dispersion away from the pocket!  Blah!

If the ideal slot in the pattern is strongly away from the pocket as played by the best bowlers in the house it is nice to watch assyms and stong recovery balls at the backend and proper surface and flare to get the ball to square up! 

If the pattern does not call for that then other setups work nicely.

Regards,

Luckylefty
PS as I think now from observing and from reading some old pieces on Columbias older website a lot of over under as described by Itallabouthim is caused by using too weak equipment or too weakly drilled equipment and maybe playing too close to the oil line and the hard friction to the outside which is present.
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #8 on: October 13, 2014, 08:11:38 PM »
Focus less on core and a bit more on the coverstock and the manufacturers listed ball shape. There is no shortage of companies with that advertised ball.

That has to then be matched up to your bowling style and the lane condition you are facing. Depending on your style and the lane condion will be a big factor in how much skid/snap or angular reaction you will get.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #9 on: October 13, 2014, 09:07:40 PM »
You also have to keep in mind of obtainable angles or ones that the bowler can actually play...bowlers are still the largest factor in creating angularity, the equipment merely enhances a bowlers attributes...
When the bowler has conditioner away from the pocket and friction to inside of the target means the bowler is improperly lined up...
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2014, 10:47:20 AM »
To expand on the last post, your own roll pattern has the biggest impact on angularity.  If you have a relatively shiny pearl, and a high axis rotation you have the primary ingredients for strong angularity, and an over under reaction on a house shot. 

I want strong angularity when I get inside, not so much on fresh patterns. 

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2014, 11:08:40 AM »
What most miss is that the reason why you are forced in is due to a lack of conditioner in the lay down area yet still conditioner in the mid lane...the bowler uses a ball that gets thru the fronts, hydroplanes thru the mids and never sees the back part of the lane or friction...I tend to use a combo of cover, surface, layout and a weight hole all used to create the proper phases of reaction to conquer the condition...not merely just a bowling ball
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

todvan

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2014, 08:51:32 PM »
Thanks all...so now I will look for a symmetric with more flip and drill it pin up.  Any ball suggestions?  Roto Asylum?  Storm Optimus?  Motiv Primal Rage?  Radical Yeti Uncaged?  Others?
« Last Edit: October 14, 2014, 08:55:15 PM by todvan »
MOTIV Jackal LE .................40 x 4.5 x 40 p2.5
MOTIV Revolt Vengeance......45 x 4.0 x 50 p3
MOTIV Forza GT ..................50 x 4.0 x 70 p2.5
MOTIV Sigma Sting..............50 x 4.0 x 45 p3

JazlarVonSteich

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
Re: More Angular = Less Control?
« Reply #13 on: October 15, 2014, 09:58:46 AM »
If you want a symmetric with more flip, then the Motiv Octane may be the perfect choice. I have one with a pin up drilling that I took up to 6000-8000 grit and it is definitely what you describe (great out of the box too, but I needed more length).

I also have a Primal Rage and it is good as well. Stronger in the oil than the Octane though. I've played around with the surface with it some and I think it definitely needs polish as well. Taking mine back in tonight to have the surface tweaked. Not seeing nearly enough oil to have it dull (even at 3000 grit).

I would say that a lot of Motiv balls might suit what you are looking for. I've switched to primarily throwing them and what I have found is that the newer coverstocks definitely promote flippiness. Even some of their "smoother" pieces are really strong off the spot. And most of their cores are symmetrical.