win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: kelley kulick  (Read 1317 times)

bullred

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 301
kelley kulick
« on: September 30, 2011, 11:35:38 AM »
I see where Kelly has signed up to appear nude in ESPN "bodies" mag



 

Leroy Taylor

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 78
Re: kelley kulick
« Reply #1 on: September 30, 2011, 07:53:22 PM »
 I'd be afraid to look..not that I haven't seen some uglies in the buff, myself included.


charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: kelley kulick
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2011, 08:16:43 PM »
1. The Athletes are NOT going to be displaying their...privates in this magazine.
 
2. Kelly has lost a lot of weight recently and I'm now guessing that it is because of this appearance.
3. Here's the article on the USBC web site about the ESPN article:
"All of the athletes will appear naked or barely-clothed (with private parts strategically covered) ..."

"None are so blind as those who will not see."
"A comedian says funny things. A comic says things funny."
 
Edited by charlest on 9/30/2011 at 8:19 PM
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Bill Thomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 692
Re: kelley kulick
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2011, 05:26:08 AM »
The gals can't make much money from bowling anymore so I guess they do what they have to do.  Unfortunately Kelly will probably get more publicity from this than from her win at the ToC or from being arguably the best female bowler in they world.  As the old song says "Ain't that a shame".



kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: kelley kulick
« Reply #4 on: October 01, 2011, 05:51:28 AM »
KK had never looked over weight, she just isn't very attractive in a feminine way when we see her. Maybe she will be after getting fixed up. After googling the others listed I wouldn't say any of them are worth getting too excited over.

"1 of 1." 
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.