win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: 607a se vs hellraiser  (Read 1048 times)

ecc0_9879

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1132
607a se vs hellraiser
« on: September 29, 2011, 02:44:56 PM »
Ok I had a 607 last year and it was the flippiest ball i have ever  thrown. I am now bowling on synthetics and last year was wood. I would  say the oil is about the same the only difference is the synthetics get  the backends cleaned better. I am wondering if the hell raiser is as  flippy as the 607 of if i should just buy another 607 and call it good?  Also if someone who has thrown both or seen them both could compare the  two for me i would greatly appreciate.       


http://s572.photobucket.com/albums/ss169/ecco_9879/

 

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2011, 11:15:01 PM »
For one to judge they would need bowler stats. ball layout comparison one to the other, ball surface, lane condition and lane topography and surface...then you might get a fair comparison. 

Scott

Scott

ecc0_9879

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
« Reply #2 on: September 30, 2011, 07:59:27 AM »
both oob im a cranker 475 rpm 17.5-18 mph one wood house dirty backends new synthetic house with clean backends

http://s572.photobucket.com/albums/ss169/ecco_9879/

ecc0_9879

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1132
Re: 607a se vs hellraiser
« Reply #3 on: September 30, 2011, 03:58:10 PM »