Author Topic: Total Inferno or No Mercy??? (Read 1816 times)

MLBOWLER · « **on:** January 29, 2007, 03:44:17 PM »

In between of this balls, what is the best for heavy oil...

Please i need a little help with this. Right know i only have the Absolute Inferno for the house shot (38 feet). but in other lanes i have problems because the lane have a lot of carrydown and the absolute is weak for that condition, so whisch one is the best? for Heavy OIL!!

Thanks.

PD: and for the dry lane conditions? dry to medium?
--------------------
ML_Bowler
"play with your heart, play with passion to win"
Pd:For view my arsenal, check my profile.

metallicaaaaaaa · « **Reply #16 on:** January 30, 2007, 02:34:21 PM »

Yea. If you look at this site under the color part, it says "red pearl". But I really don't think it is purely a pearlized ball. Something like the Blade "Pearl" or the Savage "Pearl" would obviously strike me as being Pearlized balls. But you don't see pearl in the Total Inferno. Oh well...
--------------------
"I don't wanna go home! I wanna go to Reno!"

302efi · « **Reply #17 on:** January 30, 2007, 02:38:07 PM »

quote:
Yea. If you look at this site under the color part, it says "red pearl". But I really don't think it is purely a pearlized ball."

No...Look at the bottom of the third paragraph...Qoute:

quote:
This strong down lane move delivers the highest hook potential Brunswick has achieved in a pearlized ball.

--------------------
Roto-Grip

When faced with a difficult situation, Jesus asks himself, "What would Chuck Norris do?"

Robo-Arm bowlers SUCK...

chitown · « **Reply #18 on:** January 30, 2007, 03:35:32 PM »

For Heavy oil the No Mercy would be the better choice. I also agree that if your a low track bowler then the NM may not be a good fit for you.

The NM is a very strong bowling ball with a very strong cover. Even at 4000 grit it's a beast.

This is not a knock on the TI but that's my opinion.

There are a lot of bowling balls that will work great on heavy oil. I know the Awesome Hook and Revs are good heavier oil balls.
--------------------
NFC champion Chicago Bears!

MLBOWLER · « **Reply #19 on:** January 30, 2007, 03:40:51 PM »

Hey guys i was in the website of BR and what do you think about the FURY is Solid finish 800. in the video comparation is more agressive than the Total... so the real vs are between NO MERCY and FURY Brunswick???
--------------------
ML_Bowler
"play with your heart, play with passion to win"
Pd:For view my arsenal, check my profile.

leftehh- LG · « **Reply #20 on:** January 30, 2007, 05:52:19 PM »

Total Inferno is an Absolute on steroids, I'd say get that to compliment the Absolute.
--------------------
Bowl to Win!

"Norm Duke is living proof that elves exist"

TheDude · « **Reply #21 on:** January 30, 2007, 11:38:04 PM »

I have both, and the No Mercy is stronger, stronger core, and solid coverstock. The total is good, still, it's no lazy bum, but the No Mercy revs up faster, at the breakpoint. Only down side of the No Mercy is the cover seems to shine up fast and higher maintance. Also have seen some people just not have the right layout on the No Mercy or have it too dull.

The total is an easier bet.
--------------------
Timothy @Juniors Pro-Shop
Roto-Grip Star Proshop
Etonic Stabilites Dress wearer.
Staff Writer 7-10 Split Magazine,EGO Communications
Montreal, Quebec.

Author Topic: Total Inferno or No Mercy??? (Read 1816 times)

MLBOWLER

Total Inferno or No Mercy???

metallicaaaaaaa

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???

302efi

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???

chitown

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???

MLBOWLER

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???

leftehh- LG

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???

TheDude

Re: Total Inferno or No Mercy???