I forgot to ask the question regarding Styguy's comments...
Who here thinks Emmit Smith is the greatest rusher of all time?
I think we know that nobody would say he is. This is the problem with technology as you put it. Although I'm not sure he benefitted from technology. Yikes, my head hurts now.
Anyways, another statement styguy made was that technology will raise the level that we have to play at. That's actually backwards. To average 220 now you don't have to have any skills hardly, whereas before you had to be very accurate and know how to carry.
With everything said, I do understand the frustration of the youngins. I'm 29 and when I was 18-23, I heard the same crap about how we would have been horrible back in the 60's or 70's. Guess what, maybe we would have bowled different back then! Geesh.
I for one will admit saying such things as "300's mean nothing anymore", but that is not to say that some solid 300's haven't been shot, and same with 800's. But I for one have thrown some lousy 300's and have seen plenty more! 300 should stand for something, but the skill level it takes to shoot a 300 covers quite a broad range. The same goes for a 220 average!
In other words, If I average 220 and you average 210, then I should have more skill than you. But on a sport shot that 210 person might be 10 pins higher than the 220 person, so I guess we're really talking about 2 different sports altogether.
Is this good for bowling?
--------------------
Brian
MichiganBowling.com
http://www.MichiganBowling.comFamous Last Words of a Pot Bowler--"Ok, but this is my last game!"