win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Is This Legal?  (Read 782 times)

sk1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Is This Legal?
« on: January 30, 2004, 09:32:32 PM »
I bowl in an abc sanctioned mens's league.  This year our team is in first place but only by a few games so every pin counts.  Last week we lost the first game by nearly 100 pins, the second we won by just over 50.  It was coming down to the wire in the 10th frame of the last game.  Here's my problem and question.  Our opponents were already upset that it looked like we would take 3.  Their bowler lined up, threw the ball and it was 6, 7, 10 split.  After the ball had cleared the pins but just before the pin setter came down, he showed his frustration by "kicking" the foul line, setting it off.  He then was allowed to take the foul and reshoot his second ball at a full rack, which he spared.  The next ball was a strike.  We still ended up winning the game and taking 3 but when we questioned his actions we were told what he did was right.  Now I'm not prificient in the abc rule book and believe me I plan to read up on this but was just wondering what you think.  This could be a new way of bowling if it's legal, throw a bad ball just foul and shoot for a spare!  I would appreciate any replies and thoughts on this!  Thanks!

 

Sir_rev-a-lot

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 110
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2004, 01:47:01 PM »
I don't remember the exact rule number, but anyone who commits an intentinoal Foul recieves a 0 for that frame by ABC.

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2004, 01:54:47 PM »
Check rule 5b, he should have gotten a big fat 0 for the frame.

10pin2002

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
Re: Is This Legal?
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2004, 01:56:13 PM »
The intentional foul is a zero for the frame IF AND ONLY IF it is an advantage for him to do so.  If not, it is only zero for the ball.  In this case, since it let him shoot at a full rack instead of a split, I'd have to say that this rule is in effect in this situation and he should have gotten 0 for the entire frame.