win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Luster king vs. regular polishing  (Read 3423 times)

tvphotog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Luster king vs. regular polishing
« on: January 13, 2008, 11:42:32 AM »
My brother seems to have the only bowling alley left with a luster king in it. He polishes his Doom in it and he says it out hooks his Track Delta 1. I told him that was impossible. Does the luster king put some tacky resin polish on the ball that makes it grab the lane. I told him he should give it to a pro shop to polidh it correctly.
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Logged
Mike Thomas
@tvphotog17

 

Fatboy8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3265
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #1 on: January 13, 2008, 07:56:07 PM »
Wax is about the only thing I've seen a lustre king do. Mirror like finish.
--------------------
Hammer-Lane #1
Logged

tvphotog

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 731
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #2 on: January 13, 2008, 07:58:28 PM »
It shouldn't make the ball hook more than it should, should it?
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net
Logged
Mike Thomas
@tvphotog17

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #3 on: January 13, 2008, 07:59:16 PM »
Some centers use a better compound in their machines, but I still think it's a wax based compound.

I'll leave these machines for spare balls only...
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
Logged

Fatboy8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3265
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #4 on: January 13, 2008, 08:00:20 PM »
J Mac is right, spare balls only. It shouldn't make a ball hook early at all, go very long if anything.
--------------------
Hammer-Lane #1
Logged

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2008, 08:11:40 PM »
quote:
J Mac is right, spare balls only. It shouldn't make a ball hook early at all, go very long if anything.


It also clogs the pores quite well...
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Luster king vs. regular polishing
« Reply #6 on: January 13, 2008, 08:20:12 PM »
quote:
It shouldn't make the ball hook more than it should, should it?
--------------------
Mike Thomas
Mooresville, NC
photog17@alltel.net


The Doom is for lighter oil and the Delta is for heavier oil. If he's bowling on lighter oil or if the Delta is oil clogged, of course the Doom will hook much more.

A polished pearl ball will generally go longer than a dull, solid ball. The Dull solid ball needs lots of oil to retain energy for hooking and hitting. On heavier oil, the Doom will skid 65 feet, while the Delta will skid, then hook.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQ
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »