"would you bowl in a house that reduced your average...",
NOD, here's my personal take:
I've been doing this since I was about 10 years old when my Dad managed a center in St Louis. That's about 46 years. For 22 years I was in the Air Force and bowled all around the world, in at least 12 countries I can remember,..and 300 games in 5 of them..with all that under my belt,...here's what I have learned. Average (and scores) mean nothing in a sport where you compete to win, and that's what we all do,...compete to win.
If my average in house A is 220 and I can't beat anyone, what good does it do to average 220. But let's say that my average in house B is only 206, and I'm high in the house that's great, and now I'm winning. Scores are relevant depending on the environment. Personally, I would like to bowl a good steady 660 for 3 games and win,...than shoot 760 and not cash to bowlers that I know do not have the skills that I do,..but the conditions make them that good that night...
To me, average in "numbers" means nothing,..so what if you can average 230,..and you're "average" in your league,..or you average 206, and are elite in your league. To answer your question, yes I'd bowl in a tougher house, or tougher condition,..as long as the condition is the same for both sides, and fair for all....
Average-a-holics will always be around,..guys that bowl in the easy house, and get that big book average,...for what I don't know. For me I want to win, I want my team to win,..I don't care about the scores.
--------------------
www.dynothane.com