Dale,

It's not a bad idea.  As long as the USBC made known their testing parameters, and they stayed consistent with them it might work.

For example let's say they used a typical 38 or 40 foot house pattern with X amount of oil at a certain ratio from 20 board to 10 board, then X amount outside. Then they used the throwbot set at 250 revolutions, or whatever the average bowler is, and playing on a certain line on the lane. With all those parameters being equal and consistent, then we could all have at least a basis to compare one ball to the next.

Having said that, how much would that REALLY help us?  HOOK, by itself, doesn't always translate into carry and high scores.  I have watched you throw big scores for years playing up the outside part of the lane with late movement and excellent results. I've seen you outscore many a "cranker" by using a ball that would not be considered a "mega hook" ball, but one that matched up well with your game.

I think if more people had access to good pro shops, with knowledgeable people who are willing to go out on the lanes and watch someone bowl before recommending a ball, that would take much of the guesswork out of buying a ball for the average bowler. The ball itself can be good, but with proper layout and surface prep by that same pro shop, it can be great.




--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff
www.brunswickbowling.com