win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Mid-priced equipment  (Read 3645 times)

Fishbowl815

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 183
Mid-priced equipment
« on: January 26, 2010, 10:59:43 PM »
I've started drilling up a few more of the so called mid-priced equipment and I'm actually liking them more than the premier stuff I have drilled. Expect for the extreme oil the mid-priced stuff rolls better for me and I find it to be a lot less high maintenance, Virtual Gravity needing to be hot bath every 30-50 games. Does anyone else feel like this?

 

leftyinsnellville

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2345
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2010, 07:07:22 AM »
I almost always bowl better with mid-priced equipment.  My theory is that mid-priced equipment tends to be more forgiving and I'm not as accurate as I'd like to be.  If I were a better bowler I'm willing to bet that I'd score higher with the high-end gear...but as long as I can only get out there once a week I'm really not going to improve much.
--------------------
I wanna be a house hack when I grow up.

http://averagebowlersballreviews.com/

ralphiejantz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2010, 10:28:30 AM »
Yeah after drilling a Mutant Cell a few months ago I and hating it I wont even think of going back to a high performance piece
the mid performance and entry level stuff is more than enough for me and I get better reactions and versatility out of them

I have a full swing drilled just in case I run into a very very heavy pattern at a tournament but so far that has not happened

Doug Sterner

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4395
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2010, 12:32:20 PM »
Welcome to reality.....the manufacturers are making such good mid-range equipment you do not NEED high end equipment.

There are 2 segments of today's average league bowler that need the advantages of the high end equipment...

1. Rocketman Stan...you know the type...Mr "My Ball Won't Hook" at 25 MPH

and

2. Percy Pussknuckler (thanks Mo, love the term)...aka dump and chuck, knuckles up, fudge knuckler...no hand what so ever...lower rev rate than a stalled car engine

For the rest of us the low and mid range stuff is money on house conditions. I have several customers who bowl strictly on house conditions, average 220+ and use nothing but vibes, power grooves, freezes and storm's hot line.

I mean seriously folks...if you are a THS bowler, 90% of us could make do with those last 3 balls I mentioned and save yourself some money...

Storm Fast....skid/ flip ball for mediums
Storm Furious....picks up sooner than the Fast and will take more oil
Storm Natural...perfect for when the shot gets jumpy and can be used for spares

I sell each of those balls for $141 out the door with inserts and slug. If you buy all 3 at once you get the 10% multi-ball discount and you have a full arsenal for $380.70 plus sales tax.

Who needs more?
--------------------
Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

http://dougsproshop@aol.com
www.dougsproshop.net
Lane 1 Buzzsaw...The Official Power Tool Of Bowling

For Real Time Interactive Bowling Conversation:
BowlingChat.net

Doug Sterner
Doug's Pro Shop
Owego, NY

Proud Member of the NRA
Fighting to uphold the Constitution of the U.S.

  • Guest
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2010, 02:05:09 PM »

I also agree that the mid-price stuff is very, very good for most bowlers.




--------------------
Lane Carter, Strike Zone Pro Shops - Salt Lake City, Utah
Brunswick Pro Shop Staff

www.brunswickbowling.com

The opinions expressed are solely those of the writer and not of Brunswick Corporation.

lenstanles703

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 346
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2010, 02:10:50 PM »
Yes, I like the Mid-Price stuff better as well. Brunswick Rampage and Nemesis a couple years ago and now the Ogre line from Visionary. Great Stuff!
--------------------
"We are all one"
Visionary test staff member

FBM357

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1398
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2010, 02:22:59 PM »
I find anything in the $90-$120 range to be more than acceptable.  Can't beat new cover/weaker core combos!!!

BrunsMike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2785
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2010, 02:24:14 PM »
I couldn't agree any more.

I have mostly mid priced gear. The only reason why I have the higher performance stuff like I do is because I either got a good price used for it or traded another ball for it. I find myself using my Brunswick BVP Rampage and Storm T-Road Pearl on almost every night. I had a Hammer Black Widow Pearl, great ball but it was usually too much ball for me on a normal THS night and since I don't do a lot of tournament's I gave the ball to a friend of mine. I still have a Hammer No Mercy Beat'n and Morich Awesome Finish. I think those 2 are in the higher end of the mid price'd  equipment but I find those 2 to be a bit too much over the true mid price ball's.
--------------------
Mike Zadler
"When in doubt, Pull out" - Rob Stone
Below, my stats from previous seasons:
http://members.bowl.com/SearchUSBC/ViewMember.aspx?prefix=552&suffix=12886
Mike Zadler

AdrianS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1122
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2010, 11:10:05 PM »
I get good looks with oldish 2nd hand(3-4 yrs for example) stuff a lot still, always have and its pretty cheap too!! Closeout stuff is good as well (and my driller still makes $!!)
--------------------
Time for some REAL bowling!!!
Time for some REAL bowling!!!

n00dlejester

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
  • The Dude Abides
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2010, 11:46:28 PM »
I'm gonna buck the trend a bit here and say I like the more expensive stuff.  On a fresh shot or houses with newer lane surfaces, I need match up great with asymmetric cores, or really strong symmetric cores with the latest and greatest covers.  My favorite two balls right now are the Gravity Shift and the Dimension

I use mid priced stuff, especially at tournaments.  But I find them, for my game, to be a bit over/under in reaction, and for some reason I leave a TON of corners with them.
--------------------
Proud Supporter of Rob Stone
Obviously, you aren't a golfer.
Some stayed in the foothills, some washed logs like teeth.
"This is not 'Nam. This is bowling. There are rules."

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7607
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2010, 03:09:40 AM »
Just what I learned during the past 3 years. I admit that my game is not the best, and I came to a point when I recognized that the ball I used was actually "better" than me (Awesome Finish, a classic asymmetrical high end piece). On the other side, I have been much more successful with simple, symmetrical pieces, and older coverstock technologies like PK18 or SuperFlex. I found such balls to be much more versatile, forgiving and cheaper than high end stuff, and I revamped my arsenal into this direction during the last 2 years.

Mid range rules! IMHO, any player can get along with the simpler stuff. Much of the high end bow wow is an ego or mental thing - and marketers are happy.

As a side note, I recently revived the Awesome Finish (haven't used it for 8  months or so), and I have been scoring very well with it! Seems my game has improved, but I am still not sold on high end stuff. It is also still more condition-specific than simpler balls, but when it matches up, it is a beast that truly shows its extra potential.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

AdrianS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1122
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #11 on: January 28, 2010, 03:30:48 AM »
Aww what happened to the Revolution peice(Renegade??) and Blue Particle Fuze?
--------------------
Time for some REAL bowling!!!
Time for some REAL bowling!!!

dizzyfugu

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7607
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #12 on: January 28, 2010, 03:36:05 AM »
Still alive The Renegade IS my go-to ball for medium conditions and THS, the Eliminator is semi-retired (because it only fills a small gap between my NS² and FMG), but still gets occasional action in training or in houses where I know that its specific reaction and strong setup will be more effective than the other two matte balls.
--------------------
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany

Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section
DizzyFugu ~ Reporting from Germany

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #13 on: January 28, 2010, 04:59:01 AM »
i've had great success with brunswick's mid-priced equipment in the past......rampage, wizard, nemesis, monster , etc. i've also had good luck with some of the newer stuff....copperhead, rattler, etc. however, i must admit that the c-system 2.5 has been a superior piece of equipment and it's a top of the line ball. still, the mid-priced stuff has been great.

rvmark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
Re: Mid-priced equipment
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2010, 01:54:45 PM »
As a rule I have had great success with low-mid level equipment.  The balls I have in bag today are RG Grand Illusion & Mercury, AMF Villian, and Storm Virtual Energy.  When I find enough oil to throw the VE it is money but I tend to have better scores from my Grand Illusion, Villain and Mercury as I don't bowl in the soup.

Mark