@ raincowboy: that in no way means the rules or the meeting are useless. It just means you were over-ruled by a democratic majority, which is the way most meetings go.
You could have re-phrased or re-submitted a proposal to "grandfather" them in, along with any other longstanding team of note. Obviously, other bowlers felt that the team with the 5 year tenure had value to the league.
We had a similar situation in my Monday league. My team, plus three other teams were over the cap. They voted to grandfather us in. We have been with this league since 1992. The guy who proposed that all teams over the cap should disband, and/or leave was met with disbelief by the majority. He had been a member for all of three years.
His motion garnered all of two votes. but that's the Democratic way.
Duct tape is like 'The Force'. It has a light side and a dark side, but it still holds the universe together.
Some days you're the bug; some days you're the windshield.