win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: modern lane blocking  (Read 2008 times)

stanski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2709
modern lane blocking
« on: November 08, 2004, 03:11:22 PM »
Anybody know around a rough estimate of time walls came about in modern bowling? I am very interested in learning how and why they came about in the first place.

I know that there was short oil in the 80's, and that many people didn't even use urethane when it was available. But with the advent of reactive, when did patterns become longer and slightly more uniform house to house? Is it the modern oil machines? How did we adapt to the position we are in today?
--------------------
stanski

 

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: modern lane blocking
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2004, 06:37:46 AM »
Let's see if I can answer this since I've been around awhile.  

Lane blocking goes back to the 50's.  Back in those days lanes were dressed with a flit gun and towel.  It is very easy to block lanes this way...you just have to know how to do it.  Back in those days 50's and 60's and into the 70's balls were all rubber til plastic was introduced.  Technique and shotmaking was at the utmost on an even condition.  Many houses had just one part of the lane you always played.  For instance, I know of one older house gone now that you only played the gutter.  Another you played the track and another third arrow was always best carry.

Lane surfaces were all wood and lacquer was the finish of choice.  Urethane finishes were introduced later after the amount of fires after refinishing lanes.  I remember back in the day that alleys would shut down over the holidays during mid season to pull another lacquer coat on the heads to deglaze the track.  Burnishing the track was practiced because it would make the rubber balls react better.  

Also releases in those days were many times a full roller.  It allowed a bowler to play the track without over reaction or you play from the corner with devasting carry.  Billy Hardwick was one of the best at this that I've ever seen.

It was more about how to carry with rubber and then plastic.  Remember that back then a 190 average was usually the best average in the house.  600's were a feat and a 300 might be bowled in a local association maybe a few times a year like two or three a year not two or three a night like it is now.

Lanes started to be more blocked easier in the 70's with the advent of machines like the Roto-Buff which I am very familiar with and softer plastic balls
like bleeder Col. Yellow Dots, etal.  The Roto-Buff has a short pad that a mechanic ran say 9 to 9 or so and a long pad that ran the width of the lane.  It was a manual machine you pushed down the lane and pulled back.  Conditioner was applied in the front of the machine and a swirling 360 rotation of the pad on an arm under the mahine buffed the oil on the lane.  You ran the long pad in the heads normally and the short pad any length you needed....as you can se this leads to easy blocking and a funnel to the pocket.

Back in those days you could apply lane conditioner any length.  I've forgotten what the rules were as far as the ABC/WIBC were but they also checked the lanes after any honor score was shot.  

 
quote:
But with the advent of reactive, when did patterns become longer and slightly more uniform house to house?


When ABC/WIBC came up with the SoB <System of Bowling>  so called 3 unit rule.  Where any part of the lane that the machine tocuhed including the buff out area had to have a minimum of 3 units.  I think this was started in 90 but not sure maybe a lil later.  Can run any length as long as 3 units.

Actually it's easier to block lanes with a Century 100 and allow carry down which is what most centers did in the 80's-90's.  Then, the advent of Kegel type machines higher tech and frequent/daily stripping, etc.  Easier to do a large house but harder to maintain.  It's also why you see so many weird lane conditions from week to week at many centers because they don't have the ability to maintain these high tech lane conditioning machines.  


 
quote:
How did we adapt to the position we are in today?
 


Adapt??? Not sure what you mean adapt.  

Scott
Scott

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Re: modern lane blocking
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2004, 06:45:43 AM »
Blocking lanes has been around forever.

Back in the shellac days huge scores were the norm. The surface was so soft it just naturally block itself with some use but they would help it with a mop.

Lacquer was the same way. After some use you would wear a track area with extra friction. Again with a bug sprayer and a mop they would ball them up. It wasn’t as an exact a science as now but with the lacquer lane surface it did the job.

With the advent of lane machines and urethane lane finishes things got a little more precise. I’ve seen the old machines with telescore sheets put on the outside 8 to 10 inches to keep them from oiling the outside boards. Some would go so far as they had a special mop with stripper they would run on the outside 5 boards after running the lanes just to make sure there wasn’t any oil outside.

Scores in these houses were high for the times but using hard rubber and plastic balls carry was still a little tenuous.

With the invention of the urethane ball giving more friction and then short oil came that allowed houses to legally block shots per ABC rules. Short oil gave lots of free hook since it was suppose to stop at 24 feet so the crankers and swingers had a heyday.

Finally the system of bowling came with the 3 unit minimum and it allowed long oil blocks combined with the harder hitting resins scores were off to the races.

pin-chaser

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1802
Re: modern lane blocking
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2004, 02:32:14 PM »
Depending on the definition of blocking... Allie Brandt long time holder of the ABC 3 game record of 887 was shot using a two finger ball (as this was the excepted standard using the thumb and middle finger only), shot on laquer conditions with well defined groves pointing toward the pocket at the turn of the century. Artifically guiding balls down the lane has always been around. I have personally spoke with a member of the famed Budweisers in the 70's who said "the track was so BLACK that you could see it when you walked in and the oil to the left was so thick that you could not pull the ball bad enough to not have the ball fall back into the track" he was refering to the night they shot there famous 3858 which stood for many many years.

In the days of city city tournaments in the 40's and 50's it was not uncommon for hosting cities to put a shot out that favored there team and would leave opponents bewildered and that was half the fun back then.

However, I can tell you that I personally was responsible for putting up the typical "Top Hat" type walls from 1978 through 1989 in several bowling centers (being a head mechanic). In fact we would intentionally resurface our wood lanes with the maximum amount of crown (higher in the middle) down the lane and the maximum amount of frontward tilt on the pin decks (as to lower the ringing 10 pin trajectory). Not to mention keep the flat gutters tight and at absolute minimum of depth. One house we even experimented with rough pin decks(using a screen and rotorbuffer) and different kickback materials. AMF pinsetters have the unique ability to intentionally offset pins and moving the corners forward the maximum allowable distance flat 10's were hard to come by. As the rules changed we became smarter about it using different oils the evaporated at different rates. There really is no way that you can stop a propriater from producing an artifical condition if he wants to. But todays modern lane machines are incrediably percise and effecient from lane to lane. The difference today across the house has less to do with the lane machine and more today with the enviornment.

I contend todays scores are more about bowling ball technology than anything else. They simply save up more energy and create much more entry angle thereby substantially increasing the stike percentage on poorly executed shots. As well, voided and double voided lighter pins made of more lively finishes make then fly faster and lower thereby increasing the ability to knock more down. How did we adapt to this? Ask ABC why they allowed these advances to change the game so dramatically? Evolution in technology is one thing, but to change the entire way the sport is played at the cost of disrespecting its history is unfair. (Just on mans opinion.)

--------------------

Bowling Tips and Articles at: www.bowlingknowledge.com
IRC: Internet Relay Chat on Dalnet #striketalk. 24x7x365
Sponsored by: http://bowlerx.com



Chasing pins for 45 years.

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: modern lane blocking
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2004, 02:43:00 PM »
Sure sounds like Pinbuster, Bob Hansen, pin-chaser and myself all come from the same time and background.  

PB and I are just house hacks...Bob H. and pin-chaser are the "real" bowlers among us.  

Just another hacks opinion.  
Scott
Scott

janderson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2181
Re: modern lane blocking
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2004, 02:57:38 PM »
good posts gang
--------------------
Kill the back row (or maybe this should read "make your spares, dummy")