I may get crap'd on for this, but.......
Is the modern swing totally free of muscle? There are many bowlers with a low pushaway but a very high back swing. There has to be muscle used to get it up that high over their heads. Also, the moments before the release, totally free of muscle?. Most accelerate through the release point, there has to be muscles used. In some cases, the hand is even pre set in an unnatural position at set up, to keep it there, muscles are used. then there's the coiling and uncoilig part of the release - muscles are used. Furthermore, the elbow flexes slightly on the down swing with some bowlers. If the arm is totally relaxed and no muscles used, this is very hard to do. There has to be muscle applied. So how can we say to develope a "totally free of muscle swing?" Some even start the pushaway using muscle.....
Plus, the "pendulum swing"....a pendulum is a fixed point. So shouldn't it be called a "moving pendulum" since the shoulder (fixed point) is moving forward and down.??
I've read many bowling books/articles and always get confused or question these everytime I read about these two things I've mentioned. I'm not disrespecting JJ and other bowling experts, but in the real world through my eyes, evolution of the game, and my work and martial arts experience, these don't really hold true IMO. I may not be a "bowling expert", but maybe I do know a little bit of the physiology of the shoulder and other sport related anatomy working in sports medicine a few years removed. Put on a moxy monitor or a like and go bowl...SmO2 levels don't change when a bowlers swings and rolls the ball, then I'll believe that statement "totally free of muscle swing"...
Anyway, power starts from the ground up. but, a totally relaxed punch will just be a noodle hit. (and you can break you hand) A totally relaxed muscle free swing isn't going have that "uhmph" and proper roll with the modern game. A "totally relaxed pendulum swing" statement isn't what it used to be.....