win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Which ball would be a better heavy oil ball?  (Read 621 times)

T_Bone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Which ball would be a better heavy oil ball?
« on: August 02, 2008, 11:02:46 PM »
Cell or S75 Break? Also, is the S75 Break coverstock a solid reactive?
--------------------


Todd
Todd.

 

directdrill

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1588
Re: Which ball would be a better heavy oil ball?
« Reply #1 on: August 03, 2008, 07:16:09 AM »
I have 2 Cells and 1 S-75, but all have different layouts.  My first Cell is drilled 4 x 3-1/2", pin next to ring, hit the with surface a green Scotchbrite pad (600 grit).  My S-75 is drilled pin under ring, about 4-1/2" from PAP with the MB about 4" from PAP, surface at 1000 Abralon.  I used both on the Shark in my PBA Experience league last week.  I realize it isn't a fair comparison because of the different layouts and surfaces, but on the fresh pattern, the Cell gave me a great look playing straight up 10.  Once the Cell began to read too early, I switched to the S-75 and was able to continue playing straight up 10.  In my opinion, both are good oilers, with the appropriate drilling and surface change.

I bought my S-75 from tekneek here on BR.com, and he told me the coverstock is pearl, solid, and has Mica particles, as well as the Soaker additive.  Hope this helps.
--------------------
Hook 'em Horns!

Tag Team Coaching success story.

T_Bone

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 518
Re: Which ball would be a better heavy oil ball?
« Reply #2 on: August 03, 2008, 08:08:05 AM »
Thank you for the info!!!
--------------------


Todd
Todd.