win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: PurduePaul's statistics  (Read 3816 times)

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
PurduePaul's statistics
« on: August 08, 2006, 11:21:09 AM »
This post was in another thread related to the actions of Jorge300.

I felt that it deserved a response over here on a seperate post!

By Purdue Paul.

Let's look at this for a neutral point of view first before I state my opinion:

Last year going into the Tournament of Champions, the PBA posts every week with facts and statistics from the tourhttp://www.pba.com/news/features.asp?ID=4509)

Walter Ray Williams was 4th in match play strike percentage with 62.82% which parlayed into an overall average of 223.44.

Now not saying that Robert Mushtare is on the same level as WRW, but what would the chances be that WRW bowls a 900 series.

(.6282) to the 36 power (one for every strike he has to throw) comes out to a 1 in 18,555,576 chance of bowling a 900 series. and that's for WRW the most prolific bowler in PBA history.

Now let's take in account some educated guesses...
I remember reading somewhere that his touring average was right around 212. I will assume that even at his home house his strike percentage is around 57.5% with a 85% spare shooting percentage which is appropriate stats for a 212 average bowler.

so his chances have become 1 to 448,701,572 to bowl a 900 series.

To bowl two that chance becomes 1 to 20,133,310,081,900,000

To bowl three turns to 1 to 9,033,847,885,640,000,000,000,000

Wow that's a lot...what would the chances be greater if it was walter ray you ask...

2 900s: 1 to 34,430,940,947,300
3 900s: 1 to 638,885,949,647,000,000,000

So even for Walter Ray Williams the chances of bowling two 900 series are 34 trillion to 1 on a PBA shot so just saying mushtare is as good on his house shot as WRW is on a PBA shot, I find the three 900s incredible. Lucky lefty if you would like to challenge me on the math or statistics on such feel free to. I have a BS in Chemical Engineering and a MS in mechanical engineering and have taken PLENTY of statistics courses to back this up....

Paul

Paul...

If a fellow graduates from Purdue or PennState these are outstanding institutions...I've said that in the past.  Anyone can check my statements where I laud the esteemed university.  Not necessarily every attendee...do they ALL graduate?  I don't know?

I did not even check your numbers...because I am sure they are probably right on.

I have stated before...any situation that causes a bowler to average under 9 strikes a game almost makes the chance of shooting 900 a virtual impossibility.
To proclaim one bowler will have a 900 if he averages under 240 or even 250 on a particular condition is ludicrous.  Instead the 900 will instead come from a group of bowlers averaging 9 strikes or higher.

I proposed that a group likely to bowl over 900 would be a group averaging over 9 strikes a game or the group of bowlers that throws a series over 750 during the year.  This group of series would on average produce one 900 every 318000 sets(750+ sets)!

Conditions that make 900s unlikely.

Sport Conditions
WTC conditions
PBA conditions
US Open Conditions.

This ties into one of my current thoughts...Norm Dukes sort of 900 accross 2 sets was an unbelievable accomplishment!  I don't typically believe that 900s will be ever shot on difficult conditions.

However if we take bowlers on to a cake situation and they have the type of ball that can take advantage of it!  (A vicious strike ball).  And the bowler can start to average over 10.5 strikes a game.  Then multiple 900s become not just a reality but a probability.

Take him to 11 strikes a game and it becomes a very real possibility.

All the time I hear about Probowlers coming in and averaging near 280 for 10 games in random houses around the country in pot games(usually other lane play).  Harder than bowling by one self which makes transition reading easier. If they just continued bowling they would likely experience a 900 every 25 or so sets(4/100)(if they don't hold themselves back thru the belief it can't be done)


I have stated to get in to these upper strike regions that render 900s possible one needs the following factors to make it as easy as possible.
1. a Vicious strike ball
2. Easy conditions
3. light pins
4. lively sidewalls
5. Readable transitions help(ie only one bowler from each side ie prebowling by yourself)
6. Quiet and calm mental state(match play doesn't help)
7. Believe that one can go to the unthinkable level.


None of these conditions are part of the pro tour where MOST of our great bowlers are.  Bowlers are on difficult conditions, transitions are difficult as often the bowlers are switching lanes with no practice on each new lane.  At no time do I expect bowlers in National championships to be on these type of easy conditions that produce strike ratios in the necessary high range of even 9 out of 12 or higher.

Instead these great bowlers of the PBA tour are frequently in grind it out match play mode conquering the difficult conditions they face and their opponent.

All part of my total summation of what is necessary and why more 900s are not thrown.  Our great bowlers are just not throwing enough sets on cake!  And why should they...it does nothing to help them prepare for the settings that they win money on!  Even when they come home...often their league play is devoted to difficult conditions or focusing on the match at hand and the brackets they want to win!  And frankly if they are not skying into the beyond 9 strikes a game ratio they need...they again are relegated to the group of 1/318,000(9 strikes and over) sets pursuing a 900!

In summary I believe you and I Paul are in agreement...high strike ratios are necessary.  However I believe the Protour conditions render the 900 a statistical aberration for virtually all bowlers.  Also one of the great qualities of today's champions that differs from the qualities of an elite striker is the ability to pick up spares on difficult conditions!  This important ability that Walter Ray for example has in spades...does not factor in to the 900 equation!

We agree on the statistics but we disagree on the assumptions of how many strikes cake and bowling without cross lane play can add to a power players strike ratio in relation to his difficult condition play.
 
REgards,

Luckylefty
PS for the record it was my understanding that Robert Mushtares average for his YABA league ended up near 250 including his regular...non prebowl sets with crosslane play(I have not looked it up and got this from another source).  I also believe he had a traveling league average nearer to 210.  It was not in this mode of even shooting 250 that he shot multiple 900s....it is my estimation that in his practice sessions etc that he did on this very favorable condition for his powerful ball roll that he was averaging probably in the 270 + range or near 280 for protracted practice sessions throwing by himself with no cross lane play etc before he conceived of what he could do!  





--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..

Edited on 8/8/2006 7:58 PM
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

 

ambi1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 769
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #31 on: August 10, 2006, 01:07:33 PM »
copy/pasted from LL's post..

"........All the time I hear about Probowlers coming in and averaging near 280 for 10 games in random houses around the country in pot games(usually other lane play). Harder than bowling by one self which makes transition reading easier. If they just continued bowling they would likely experience a 900 every 25 or so sets(4/100)(if they don't hold themselves back thru the belief it can't be done)"

LL -- have you re read your post??  "a 900 every 25 or so sets ..." !?!?!? I mean no disrespect, but have you had time to stop and sit and read your post.. ?? I mean, over reeeeeeaaching a bit would be an understatement.  Every 25 or so sets they had the chance for a 900 except for the gremlin of doubt/uncertainty/ pressure etc.. on their shoulder??

By the way, in the espn link, was that Mushtare finishing at the foul line??  Because if he finishes like that,  sorry, have to say no one could shoot 900 being unstable like that at the finish line.  Doubt if he could even do 220's on a tough lane.  Or maybe as someone so eloquently put it.. " he must be the luckiest SOB .. and let me edit it a bit.. in this solar system... LOL!!

--------------------


DARK BEER IT IS THEN!

Edited on 8/10/2006 1:03 PM

Edited on 8/11/2006 5:06 AM


DARK BEER IT IS THEN!

purduepaul

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 474
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #32 on: August 10, 2006, 01:53:09 PM »
Editing accepted ;-)
--------------------
Famous Words said to me:"I may be a magician of carrying but I'm still beating you"  "GO TO YOUR HOME WHY DON'T YOU LIKE YOUR HOME"--said towards a solid 8 pin
"Oops, Looks like we are going to need another timmy."  -Dr Lizard, "Dinosaurs"

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #33 on: August 10, 2006, 02:27:06 PM »
quote:
Guys,

I read a couple of posts after I put something out there that I thought would be a benefit to all bowlers...trying to get to the next level!
I've erased that post!

I've all of a sudden seen the light!

Here are my new conclusions based on the resounding weight of numbers of people who have to be right!  There are many of them.

1.  A 900 cannot be shot...and when it is, it is a statistical anomaly.  If it can be shot...it will not be you or me, but someone else or a name pro!
2.  Statistics cannot seperate the elite strikers from the average bowler and give us all an equal almost infinitely small chance of shooting 900 ...it won't be you or me!
3.  Mental techniques that sound like scientology are a bunch of tofu eating garbage. Continue as you were, you are already at exactly the level you want to be!
4.  War and peace is a suitable book to read but not on ball reviews.
5.  One line answers like KDawg of Joe Bowler or Fireguy is the way to go!
6.  Robert Mushtare could not shoot a 300, 800, 859, multiple 800s ever because he cannot tear up a sport condition and is not a name bowler with enough experience good gosh...he is only 17.  Did I get that right...?

YOu will see no more WAR and PEACE...no more posts on how to go to the next level...because they are all TOFU eating squishy stuff!  Good luck in all your group think mind meld activities!  

You'll see me on WANTED FOR SALE!  Mind meld time!

REmember these thoughts next time you are on track to the highest set you've ever had....
"1:129 ca zillion.., it can't be done, RObert Mushtare didn't do it,
I can't do it, I'm not Tommy Jones, my father owns the center,
it's not a sport condition, I don't deserve this, I don't have enough experience, He's Tommy Jones not me...., those side walls are way too bouncy,
I'm not this good, He's better than me...how can I screw this up...so I don't stand out...War and Peace, KDawg said!, my father doesn't own the center, 9 pin....shouldn't I have one by now?, I never bowled in college, My spelling stinks, Nobody is gonna like this,  I'm bowling with my other hand..I can't beat these guys..., my grammar is bad...I can't throw all these strikes, statistics say.....dadadadada!!  AHhh...blew it!  phewwww!

Back to my average....AHHHHH doesn't that feel better...now I'm right where I should be!!  Consistently...me!

Goodlucky to ya all...you are right!

Luckylefty
PS if you have an interest psychopsybernetics...silva mind method etc.  feel free to contact me by message I'd be glad to tell you how I've used it...I'm not in that business.  
For the group above..."as you were".
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..

Edited on 8/10/2006 11:43 AM


Lefty, instead of sarcasm, why couldn't you answer my questions? I am trying to figure out your "logic". I just asked serious questions. Why do you choose to ignore it everytime someone asks you a direct question? If you could answer these, maybe others can "see where you are coming from".
--------------------
Jorge300

"Ray, next time someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!"

Edited on 8/10/2006 2:24 PM
Jorge300

Mike Austin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2057
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #34 on: August 10, 2006, 09:42:54 PM »
LL, I don't remember reading where you were discussing psychofiberoptics to try and help anyone reach any level.  You were mentioning it to show an average bowler and/or yourself could use it to reach nirvana or something.  If you believe that Mushtare shot the scores say so, please don't try to push statistics that are proven flawed on the rest of us as written in stone.

It is POSSIBLE that Robby shot his scores, Red Sox and the White Sox won the World Series, anything CAN happen.  It is so highly improbable that Robby shot those scores when you consider everything that we have seen, know, etc.  It just doesn't add up, he didn't shoot the scores.  If he did, I'm the starting center for the Rockets next year.  (I'm 5'7" not 7'7")

You didn't answer any of Jorge300's questions, or honestly apologize to him.

Please don't sue me for implying that you are an average bowler and/or that being an average bowler is bad.

Finally, when you are the only one arguing this point, and EVERYONE else thinks the opposite/differently than you, you could be wrong.

Other than that, I'm gonna be a shrimp boat captain with Forrest....
--------------------
Mike Austin's Precision Pro Shop
Houston, TX

Driller to many "Stars" and Tony Melendez too!

"So Many Balls, only ONE drill press!!"

Chuck Norris is the only person to ever count to infinity..........twice!
Mike Austin's Bowling Dynamix Pro Shops
Inside Emerald Bowl
Inside Tomball Bowl
Track Pro Staff Member
Vise Grips Staff Member

WillynHook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 385
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #35 on: August 11, 2006, 01:01:16 PM »
First, I haven't read every post. I only looked at the posts with
"statistics" calculations. I am trying to deftly side-step the personal
feelings and red-faced responses that have occured within this tread.

So what do I have to post? Just some comments about "statistics" and the
weight in an argument they should carry.

My thoughts:

1. "statistics" and the "numbers" that are used in reporting them are NOT SCIENTIFIC FACTS! Most stats start off by using very subjective questions and assumptions. So when I see someone say "you have been presented with some facts...and your argument is bogus" (paraphased) I can't help but cringe.

2. Let me be clear. Statistics are not "data" to PROVE a point or answer a
question. "Statistics" are empirical in nature. Statistics, however, can
be used to HELP make a prediction or weight an argument.

3. You can start off with very different but logical assumptions about a
single question and end up with contrary "statistical" results. For example, you can find a statistical correlation between geography and poor health care.
But is it the state we live in? Or the economics of the region? Or that an
unknown variable of werewolves eating doctors in that county?

4. Statistically speaking, people have a better chance of being killed by asteroid
impact than by shark attack even when they are swimming amongst a bunch of sharks.
One event, I am assured death because the asteroid gets everyone. The other
event among the sharks, I am personally worried, but I am only one person of 3 billion - so the statistical chance is low. Hey, what is that nibbling on my
toe?

5. Every debate and argument can be supplied with "statistics" to support their
cause on both sides. Before I would start to quote the ESPN odds on the
whole issue, I would like to know what the baseline assumptions are because
everytime I see odds, statistics, and percentages used on most entertainment
and news programs they are at least incompete or at worst nonsense.

6. There is a difference between "statistical odds" and "mathematical odds."
This whole debate is in the realm of "statistical odds" which has much less
traction in an argument.


Dr. Joe

P.S. Yes, I use statistics everyday, but I know the assumptions, the question,
and am careful how to critically analyze what they "might" be saying. I never
use them to conclude a factual result only subjective possibility.

--------------------
Dr. Joseph Howard
Joe's Physics Page    

"Imagine what you could do,
if you could do what you imagine"


F.O.S. Member & Physics Researcher
Uranium Pearl - 16 lbs
Uranium Solid - 15 lbs
Cobalt Bomb - 15 lbs
Tsunami H^2O - 15 lbs
Bullet - 16lbs
XXXL - 16lbs
Lane 1: 4 Ball Roller



Edited on 8/11/2006 12:58 PM

Edited on 8/11/2006 1:09 PM

Ragnar

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 14084
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #36 on: August 11, 2006, 01:09:39 PM »
Remember what Disraeli said. "There are lies, damned lies, and statistics."

Also remember, the average human has one breast and one testicle.
--------------------
"I do desire that we may be better strangers."  Willie the Shake, As You Like it(III,ii)
http://ystig.com/spaghetti.jpg

Edited on 8/11/2006 1:04 PM
Wyrd bið ful aræd!
(Thought to be a member of something called the PMS club by some.)

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: PurduePaul's statistics
« Reply #37 on: August 14, 2006, 07:41:00 AM »
ttt

Lefty, another chance to answer the questions directed at you. Just trying to find any logic in your responses. Here is a chance to defend your position.
--------------------
Jorge300

"Ray, next time someone asks you if you're a god, you say YES!!"
Jorge300