win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...  (Read 3175 times)

jimc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« on: February 24, 2014, 02:55:42 PM »
Anyone have any thoughts on what may be in the current Brunswick or DV 8 lineup that is similar to the Eruption Pro?

 

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2014, 03:09:54 PM »
Strike King or Diva/Diva pearl
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2014, 03:12:59 PM »
Melee would be nearly identical, and the Dude would be similar, though a bit weaker. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2014, 03:15:02 PM »
DV8 Dude is pretty close.
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

jimc

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 43
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2014, 03:28:15 PM »
Thanks to those that have responded.  Extremely helpful!
BrunsNick - your thoughts on the diva or diva pearl as compared to the eruption pro?

NHLfan88

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2014, 03:38:39 PM »
diva pearl is way closer than the dude or diva.  the e-pro has a pretty big back end movement
Those who can't bowl, bowl with two hands.

BrunsNick

  • Brunswick Rep
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7306
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #6 on: February 24, 2014, 06:12:38 PM »
Diva will be stronger overall IMO.

Diva Pearl still a touch stronger, hard for me to suggest a pearl to replace a solid.

Reason I chose Dude is the similar cover and differential. I don't see either as a super strong ball, especially in oil.
Nick Smith
Digital Media Manager - Brunswick Bowling
http://www.brunswickbowling.com
http://www.youtube.com/c/brunsnick

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2014, 07:55:19 AM »
I've gotta side with Nick here . . the Diva Pearl may be ok, but replacing a solid with a pearl generally isn't the best way to go.  Solids also usually take better to surface changes.  The Melee would be the closest in terms of shape, but Dude would be the closest hook potential but smoother, the original Diva is more hook and a slightly different shape, and the Diva Pearl may be a similar shape, but with more length and a cleaner, sharper breakpoint.  From what I've seen though, the Diva is quite a bit more sensitive than the Eruption. 
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2014, 08:39:26 AM »
Hmmmm....Inferno, Absolute Inferno, Vapor Zone...ALL pearls with surface that reacted, well like solids...
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2014, 08:56:19 AM »
Lol hey now, I just said solids usually take better to surface changes, not that pearls couldn't or wouldn't . . and I've had many a sanded pearl in my day, a Vapor Zone included, and yes, it did act like a solid  ;D

Hmmmm....Inferno, Absolute Inferno, Vapor Zone...ALL pearls with surface that reacted, well like solids...
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?

JustRico

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2652
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2014, 09:01:39 AM »
Just saying (: do not stay antiquated in ones thought process with looking at ball motion

Eruption Pro cover is basically the same as the Arson Low Flare
Co-author of BowlTec's END GAMES ~ A Bowler's COMPLETE Guide to Bowling; Head Games ~ the MENTAL approach to bowling (and sports) & (r)eVolve
...where knowledge creates striking results...
BowlTEc on facebook...www.iBowlTec.com

Gizmo823

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2167
Re: Those familiar with Brunswick and Columbia...
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2014, 09:39:17 AM »
Of course  ;)  That's why I said generally . . I favor watching actual ball reaction over numbers and makeup anyway.  Seen many a ball that was moderately different than another by the numbers, but they reacted very similarly. 

That new LT48 might actually be a decent match too, but it might be a bit too smooth and weak. 

Just saying (: do not stay antiquated in ones thought process with looking at ball motion

Eruption Pro cover is basically the same as the Arson Low Flare
What would you be if you were attached to another object by an inclined plane, wrapped helically around an axis?