Can a league adopt a rule to curtail late or nonpayment of league fees?
According to Rule 110a, a league could adopt a rule stating games will be forfeited if participants in a team’s lineup are not current in their fees. With such a rule, if the members present do not submit their own fees, the games are subject to forfeiture.
However, games cannot be forfeited if fees are not paid when a member is absent or the team has a vacancy. If the absent member does not pay in full upon return, then all games the member bowls while in arrears would be subject to forfeiture if a timely protest is filed. The league board should not hesitate to enforce the rule when there is a violation and should be consistent in the application of its rules.
It is the last part of this rule that your situation would fall under. First, he didn't enforce the rule consistiently. Second, he knew your guys were in violation and admits to making an agreement with you about the arrearages that went against the league rule.
Again, you cannot allow something to knowingly go on and then decide to enforce it at a later date as punitive acion. The reason the rule is null the first time a bowlers scores are allowed to be used when he is in arrearages is because if the rule was enforced that day the bowler would then know he has to pay up or else forfeit more games/points.
It has to be enforced strictly or not at all. USBC will back you up on this. Especially if all monies were caught up eventually.