win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Another Worth less Review  (Read 1891 times)

pnj1967

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
Another Worth less Review
« on: September 01, 2009, 08:01:26 AM »
Logged






 

pnj1967

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #1 on: September 01, 2009, 04:02:35 PM »
Logged






OddBalls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3119
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #2 on: September 01, 2009, 04:04:06 PM »
quote:
http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?BallID=834&ManufacterID=12&ReviewID=31602
--------------------



spel chek is ur fiend..
--------------------
Yes. it's I, the Inverted One..

Logged

nutsforbowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 965
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #3 on: September 01, 2009, 04:05:38 PM »
Those are very good. Short and to the point. And I agree on the 715A, it's a good ball.
--------------------
Me stupid. Me believe anything. Please tell me what to do.
Logged

snowspike1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2009, 08:06:23 PM »
quote:
This is almost as bad !!

http://www.ballreviews.com/Reviews/Reviews.asp?BallID=968&ManufacterID=12&ReviewID=31600
--------------------









My ex-wife was like that ball then..... A lot of backend...  too bad it migrated too... that and she turned into a (^&^&%^$#####$%^&&*((
LOL
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2009, 08:34:42 PM »
We need to promote, even advertize the good reviews and ignore the bad ones. The opposite does us no good as a usable, desirable bowling web site.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

baltimora

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 886
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #6 on: September 01, 2009, 09:08:20 PM »
wait i have just wrote my next review. i bought (insert ball name) looking for a back end shape like jennifer lopez but (insert ball name) had a look more like rosie o'donnell in a beige thong. tried changing surface with abralon pad but ended up with more a anne heche/ellen degeneres over under problem. for any of our members that might be lesbian i am sorry if i have killed your libido for the next week....
--------------------

Logged

pnj1967

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #7 on: September 02, 2009, 06:02:33 AM »
c, You are right!! But when the people who run this site will do nothing, why even care some times.

I have sent messages about some of the "REVIEWS" (NOT THESE) , and NOTHING, some of these were just double posts, same thing  posted twice by same person within 2/3 seconds !!


quote:
We need to promote, even advertise the good reviews and ignore the bad ones. The opposite does us no good as a usable, desirable bowling web site.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

--------------------








Edited on 9/2/2009 9:12 AM
Logged






Unhomed

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 176
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #8 on: September 02, 2009, 07:53:42 AM »
Curious ... both bad reviews written by the same person.
--------------------
Life is a ball, one frame at a time.
Logged

Artimust

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 795
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #9 on: September 02, 2009, 10:40:47 PM »
But he got 2 300 games with it!  That says it all!!!
Logged

Kid Jete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2559
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #10 on: September 02, 2009, 11:13:40 PM »
quote:
But he got 2 300 games with it!  That says it all!!!



Exactly.  Need he say more?
Logged

trash heap

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2648
Re: Another Worth less Review
« Reply #11 on: September 03, 2009, 09:51:54 AM »
The Review Section some how needs to expand. Basically it should have some automatic requirements like:

1. Type of Bowler - Cranker, Stroker etc.....or maybe this could be broken down a little more to Ball Speed, Rev Rate, anything else

2. Drilling - Description from the Drill sheet.

3. Surface of the ball. Did the bowler sand it or polish it. What did they do to the ball.

4. What pattern and type of lanes are they bowling on - If the bowler tries the ball on different patterns then they should have different reviews for each pattern. Where they were standing and what was their target.


I think something like this would make reviews worth the time to read.

Edited on 9/3/2009 9:53 AM
Logged
Talkin' Trash!
Pages: [1]
« previous next »