Once again, I'm just going by the numbers, and so far they've kept me pretty close. Jaros over Healey. Jaros had some pretty big scores against him in the round of 8, not to mention winning the match. Wiseman over Johnson. Neither of these guys bowled SUPER great in the round of 8, but Wiseman has the experience, and I don't believe Johnson's ever bowled on tv, it's his first year, right? Monacelli and Jaros could be a close one, they've both got some numbers in their favor, but I'm going to have to go with Jaros. Jaros's game is so simple and so easy to make subtle changes with that once there have been a couple games on the lanes and the oil has started to change from the tv lights, I think Jaros will be less affected by the changes than Monacelli. Again, that one's a tough one, but Jaros is my pick. Wiseman vs Jaros in the final match, and I think that Wiseman's ability to play very deep is going to be a strength for him as the lanes break down, his angle will give him more length and help take small dry spots out of play. I can see Jaros hitting the pocket a lot and pretty easily, and if he carries well, it'll be close, but I'm picking Wiseman. Honestly, I think it could go either way, but I've gotta pick somebody . .
--------------------
The weekly signature series, by Hamster.
My cat is 21. I never thought I'd see the day when I'd actually think that 21 year old "kitty" was a bad thing.
