Please, please, please explain something to me.
You decide to open a bowling center or own one. You have 32 lanes. In order to open you must turn on lights and air conditioning for the entire place. You must pay employees to be there. You complain that bowler pushed out seniors and youth.
How many lanes were your seniors and youth using?
During the work week, at the Bowlero house I used to bowl at, they had 40 out of the 50 lanes being used for senior leagues during the week, and every lane used for youth bowling on Saturdays. At the independent house I bowl at, the house is packed throughout the week as well as on the weekends until the mid afternoon. Both alleys opened at 9am or earlier.
Most of the time I visited centers early Saturday morning or during the week when seniors bowled a league, less than 50% of the lanes were in use. How do you expect a business to make money.
Again, the stats are situational, because what may not work for you at one particular location is/was working for others in other locations; Bowlero or otherwise.
Yes Bowlero has made some poor decisions. But I cannot fault them for adjusting their hours so that they can make a profit. Even centers owed by individuals are trying to make a profit.
Yes, all bowling centers are trying to make a profit; however, I don't see individual bowling centers in the areas I frequent adjusting their hours and cutting out leagues to do as such. One such alley in Sacramento is still making a killing of it with opening at 9am every day. Another stays open 24 hours, and again, not a single problem. The ones that we've seen struggling at any point, are the ones owned by Bowlero.
There are no Bowlero locations within a 200 mile radius of Las Vegas, or Omaha, so we also don't have that issue there, as most alleys in Vegas are open 24 hours, and every alley in Omaha opens at 10am, with the exception of Saturday mornings, when they are open at 8am, as leagues start at 9am.
If I owned a center and saw thru metrics that opening early for youth and seniors was not a profitable thing to do, I too would adjust my hours. I wouldn't lose money because that's just the way it was done in the past.
Again, everything there is situational. In the 3 cities I frequent, I am not seeing that issue for it to be blamed, except only at Bowlero locations. This doesn't make it a profitability issue; instead, this seems to be isolated only to Bowlero.
It's quite selfish in my opinion that bowlers think they are special and places of business should lose money because well they used to be open. It's not a business' job to be a place for seniors to meet.
It isn't. What is happening is the very thing you're complaining about; the owner is removing the very thing they need: patrons so they can earn a profit. You don't spend $1000 to earn $1050; that extra $50 doesn't get you anything. In fact, in doing what they have done, they have further shot themselves in the foot to where they have had to rethink their business practice and pivot BACK to what they were doing before: hosting leagues and attracting the league bowler, because they lost the biggest revenue stream they had: REPEAT CUSTOMERS.
And yes bowling is not growing as a sport. And if you think that is because Bowlero isn't open Saturday mornings, I disagree. Kids these days care about video games, Netflix, etc. All youth participation sports are down across the country. You shouldn't blame that on Bowlero.
No-one is solely blaming Bowlero on that; however, they are contributing to the problem by not having a place for those kids to go so they get out from in front of the TV or their screens. Besides, like with seniors, they shot themselves in the proverbial foot by taking away yet another revenue stream, that further pulls from their profits. They can't have it both ways, in complaining about not making money, while not doing anything to help generate that money.
Yes USBC needs to improve. I agree 100% on that.
That's a given. We all know that; hopefully the USBC does improve.
But USBC membership is $22 (maybe going up) a year. That's 1/6 of the new bowling ball you just bought from Storm. That's the cost of the package of finger tape you bought from the pro shop.
I don't understand what you are expecting for $22 for an entire year. Bowlers bitch that they don't get multiple rings. Each ring at a minimum cost USBC $50. So your bitching that "you" didn't make a profit on your $22 investment.
You have to have a place to put that $22 membership to use. It doesn't help, let alone do a bloody thing if Bowlero limits the time to put that membership to work. That isn't the USBC's fault; again, that lies squarely on Bowlero.
USBC servers all levels of bowlers. Yes most of the complaining I see on here comes from the 190+ averages. (not always) Go survey your 150-170 average league bowlers who buy $50 worth of beer each week. You know what, they don't care what USBC does or doesn't do. They pay their $22 a year and order their 3 pitchers of beer a night. It's a select group of bowlers that want/expect USBC to meet their needs. The rest don't care.
Again, they will care when their options are limited for where they can go bowl that 150-170 average and drink those beers. What they will then tend to do is not bowl at all, which takes money away from the USBC as well as Bowlero, leaving both in the lurch and complaining about the very thing they are complaining about now. They don't have the right to complain when they do this to and kneecap themselves.
BL.