The thing that bugs me is the bubble that says "The Guru has better ball motion and more overall hook than the Zero Gravity"...
That word "better"... that's not scientific, thats opinion. The ball motions are different, and shouldn't they be? You're comparing a 2.55/0.37/0.010 core with a 2.50/0.044/0.018 core. I did not know that the criteria for "better" was more hook. I'm quite positive they could have moved the throwbot 2-3 boards right and blown the pocket up with the Zero Gravity.
If I'm bowling on a burnt house shot, my Boost is going to give me a "better" ball motion than a Guru, correct?
Let's stop pretending that this is scientific video and take it as what it is, propaganda.
And not including the DV8 and Brunswick balls because Phil and Mo "already know the Guru would outperform them".... so before the test they didn't know it would outperform the Deadly Aim, Sinister, Cruel Intent, Pivot and Zery Gravity? right....