win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Reactive pearl v.s. Particle pearl  (Read 884 times)

RIP_THE_RACK

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 5
Reactive pearl v.s. Particle pearl
« on: March 19, 2004, 01:32:14 AM »
Which coverstoke is ultimately more bang for your buck.
What are the weaknesses of both of these cover stocks.



 

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: Reactive pearl v.s. Particle pearl
« Reply #1 on: March 20, 2004, 03:07:29 PM »
It's interesting, of all the classes of ball, I think I have consistently had less success with pearl particles than any other class of ball.

Occassionally they work for me but they are very touchy!
One should get more midlane from a pearl particle and less backend than it's reactive pearl cousin.

One's I have tried with various good success.  Core Power LRG, Shock Zone, Riot Zone, Track Freak out.  

The best was the Riot Zone(more particle arc) or Shock Zone(closer to a reactive).  Both were awesome unless there was carrydown and then they seemed to just disappear as far as effectiveness.

REgards,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana