win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Rome comparing bowling to golf  (Read 3719 times)

1fife

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
Rome comparing bowling to golf
« on: February 22, 2004, 09:08:53 PM »
I was listening to Rome last week and he was comparing bowling to golf.

He said bowling wasnt a sport and golf was.

His main point was bolwing wasnt because you could get anyone to bowl a 175 average and you couldnt get anyone to golf a 78.

He said if you practiced a couple days a wekk for a year your bowling average would get  to 175, but if you practiced 2 days a week not everyone could get to a 175.

Is he on crack-he is trying to compare a 175 to a 78 in golf

No one called and brought this point up

how about 175=95
or 220=78

but 175 doesnt equal 78.

Once again bowlers getting the short side of it

 

Kid Jete

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2559
Re: Rome comparing bowling to golf
« Reply #16 on: February 24, 2004, 01:33:34 AM »
Okay I said a month or 2... not 3.  Obviously after a certain period of time breaking 100 conistantly is possible, I would even agree that some coudl do it at or around 2 months but I highly doubt much sooner.  I am also talking about someone that has had absolutely no golf experience prior.

 
quote:
Weeks of preparation off course before each round prepared him.
 


What's your point?  He practiced a hell of alot off the course.  I never said anything about how many actually rounds someone has played.  Practicing on the range and on and around the putting and shipping green sure as hell counts as experience... I very seldom practice ON the course.


Now if you are telling me you took a good athlete that had absolutely no golf experience and knew nothing about it and he shot 81 in only 3 weeks of practice you are full of it.  That or the course had 18 par 3's.  I can see someone breaking 100 after 3 weeks of non stop practicing and being an ungodly athlete but even then I doubt it.

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: Rome comparing bowling to golf
« Reply #17 on: February 24, 2004, 02:01:49 AM »
3 months!

Also took a woman, first round of golf for 9 holes was 42!  She teed every ball up and the course was slightly shorter than regulation!  Again trained for 6 weeks!

REgards,

Luckylefty
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

OR Bowler

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Rome comparing bowling to golf
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2004, 02:37:45 AM »
Ok so I have never golfed. I've been bowling for about 11 years now and have an avg in the 210-215 range. But from the posts I read through, which I didn't read all of them, I got that no one brought up the fact that true, any one could go take bowling lessons for a few months and be shooting 220's.... on a house patter. Because today that's how centers set up the shot, so anyone that throws the ball out with some hook can get the ball back to the pocket, or if you tug the ball 10 boards it will most likely hold. And they do this so they get more people in there bowling. But you take that person that shoots 220's on that house pattern, put them on a sport shot and they'd be lucky to roll in the 150's.

So yes, just about anyone could bowl a game in the 200's on a walled pattern, probably just as easily as your once a month golfer could shoot under par at their local course. But if you go to a course with more hazards, more slopes around the holes and all in all just a more challenging course, I am sure that person that shoots par on the easy course would have a long day. Just as your average league bowler would on a sport shot.

But then again, I feel like golf and bowling are about as similar as football and basketball. They take different skills to master.