win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Solid reactive Vs. Particles  (Read 880 times)

azus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1867
Solid reactive Vs. Particles
« on: August 20, 2005, 11:06:33 AM »
What is best? I know particle excels in oil, but i know that solid reactives also are good. Whats the advantage/disadvantage with the solid and particle.

 

azus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1867
Re: Solid reactive Vs. Particles
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2005, 07:12:47 PM »
S. Reactive holds longer than than particle?

JamesCube

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 172
Re: Solid reactive Vs. Particles
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2005, 07:28:20 PM »
My understanding is the following:

When particles first came out there was a lot bigger difference between them and reactives than there is now.

Now, the loads of particles are pretty low in a lot of balls and the newer reactive formulas that companies use are pretty strong.  The difference on the lane is really that the hook is more rounded with a particle.  

If you had two balls that were the exact same except one had a low load of particles added, the plain reactive one would have more of a snap while the particle would have an arcy change of direction.
--------------------
Lake LeBoeuf Lanes is where real men go to bowl.
Current 2-ball Arsenal: Sling Blade, The Deal

Bjaardker

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2387
Re: Solid reactive Vs. Particles
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2005, 08:55:51 PM »
Here's the difference,

Reactive resin is made for one purpose, skid in oil, hook on dry.

Particles are made to grab and start the roll in the presence of oil.

Through different surface preparations you can blur those lines. Polished particle to delay friction, sanded reactive to encourage friction. But at the end of the day, the basics have not changed.

Based on that you can now apply this to the kind of lane conditions you expect to be bowling on & what style a bowler you are. A cranker bowling with good head oil & backends can do amazing things with a solid particle, as they have the revs to bring the ball back to the pocket. Meanwhile the stroker needs that extra friction in the heads to begin his roll. That same stroker might need to switch to a reactive if the heads are burning up & he's playing the outside boards, on the other hand the cranker may switch to the particle to play the very deep over the gutter shot.

Hope this helps. BJE