win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: RE: The good old days  (Read 4281 times)

9andaWiggle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13414
RE: The good old days
« on: May 04, 2003, 12:57:22 AM »
In reference to Sawbones post about the good old days, I noticed several remarks about "cheater balls", "easy lane conditions, i.e. the wall", and more pleas to put the integrity back into the scores.  So often we hear bashing of the easy house shot, but I don't think the oiling of the lane is the biggest factor.  Next time you're at league, really watch how people are bowling, and the carry they are getting out of the high tech equipment that is available.  Half the people shooting high scores do not accurately bury the pocket on most of their shots.  Anything light will carry, through the nose will carry (except for the hard core crankers), and brooklyn will carry.  No longer is being accurate as big a benefit as it once was.

Maybe it is time to up the weight of the pins a few ounces.  Since the equipment technology is already allowed, it can not be banned.  Therefore, the easiest solution to putting some "integrity" back into the scoring is to increase the pin weight to help combat the stronger equipment.  At the same time, though, limits have to be placed on future ball technology, otherwise the manufacturers will just build an even stronger ball to obliterate the heavier pins.

What do you think?  Would making centers use heavier pins rather than trying to enforce stricter oil procedures be the easiest solution to help curb the scoring spree we currently have going on?  Maybe this could be phased in over a couple of years so the houses wouldn't be put into a financial bind right away.  Pins only last so long, so when the center has to replace the old ones, only make the heavier ones available to them.  Eventually every center will be using the heavier pins.  Just an idea...

--------------------
9-

Why, WHY won't the last one just fall??  It's WIGGLING for cryin' out loud!!
Little Bo Peep has lost her sheep...

I wonder where they went? ;)

 

Game In a BoxLC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2003, 04:00:15 PM »
you dont need to alter the pins, change the shot from a dead wall. See my post on sport shot meets house bowlers for a great depiction of what happens when these bowlers are put to a hard shot.
--------------------
am i still considered a lefty, i never get to play the left side of the lane

9andaWiggle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13414
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2003, 04:18:52 PM »
Sorry, Doug, but now you're going to be leaving 5-7-10's!!  LeftyCrank does have a good point about the oil.  I was just thinking along the lines of how tough it would be to get houses to put down a tough shot (and police the patterns).  Any other ideas?

--------------------
9-

Why, WHY won't the last one just fall??  It's WIGGLING for cryin' out loud!!
Little Bo Peep has lost her sheep...

I wonder where they went? ;)

Game In a BoxLC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2003, 04:33:53 PM »
Content Removed by Webmaster

SrKegler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #4 on: May 04, 2003, 04:59:15 PM »
Right now we are in a catch 22 situation.  None of the houses are going to put out a tougher shot than the other houses in the area and risk losing customers.

I have to disagree about oiling pattern not having that much affect of scores.  Try bowling with even 5-10 units of oil on the outside boards.  On edit, in my opinion, the balls help the carry, the lane conditions help funnel the ball to the pocket.  It seems to me like the pocket is almost impossible to miss.

Problem is ABC has already tried legislating oil patterns before, most of us remember the short oil fiasco.  Doubt very much if they will try it again.  I'm still puzzled where they came up with the 3 unit minimum outside.  That's next to nothing.

Even if they did change to rule to more oil outside, how many houses would abide by it.  I've ran into quite a few that won't put that much outside.  They do have a legal shot programmed into their oiler, just only use that shot when the lanes are going to be inspected.  Without the ABC going back to inspecting the lanes after an honor score, legislation isn’t going to matter.  It’s going to take having a few honor scores disallowed before houses will start complying.

Whats a shame is I was talking with some old friends that own houses and use to run tournaments.  Wasn’t nothing to have 200-300 people show up each weekend.  He was talking about how that loss of revenue really hurt his business.  He now runs a monthly scratch tournament that might have 30-40 entries and was wondering what he could do to get the entries up.  I mentioned putting out a tougher shot. He said if he did that he would lose all his business.  What’s puzzling is this is a scratch tournament (400+ for 10 games is the norm).  If you are attracting scratch bowlers, what difference does the shot make.

I felt if the scores dropped into a more reasonable range (220) some of the 205-210 averages might give it a shot.   Before the scoring explosion it usually took around 100-150 over to cash.  During that time we had lots of 180-190 averages coming out to give it a shot.

Oh well, sorry for the long rant.  Just frustrated about the way the game is going today.


Edited on 5/4/2003 5:07 PM
Have Balls - Will Travel


RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones

Game In a BoxLC

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 305
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2003, 05:03:14 PM »
if a tournament told me, their putting out a sport shot or other type of demanding shot, i say i will be there! because on  ashot like that over 12 games the best bowler will win, or at least one of the best, not the most lucky, or the one with the best ball. It demands you to be good, which is what i thought scratch was about?
--------------------
am i still considered a lefty, i never get to play the left side of the lane

SrKegler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3020
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #6 on: May 04, 2003, 06:26:08 PM »
You're preaching to the choir.

What happens with the tougher shots is all of a sudden consistency, especially speed control, and accuracy come into play instead of area.  Some of the higher averages I've run across can run the big strings but can't cover a corner pin.  Take away their area and they can't compete.

I've found the milder equipment to work best, something you can keep in play without any over reaction.  Would love to have a Viper or pro-purple to use on this condition.

Have Balls - Will Travel


RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones

Urethane Game

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #7 on: May 04, 2003, 07:31:17 PM »
I believe heavier pins should be part of the equation.  I also do not believe that the 12lb ball throwing recreational bowler will be driven away by having fewer strikes as argued by Johnny Petraglia in Bowling Digest.

I should mention that it is still possible to shoot big games on heavy pins when the shot is walled up.  I had a five bagger across five pairs in a 5lb lead pin pot match 12 years ago with a Blue Hammer. As long as it is easy to get the pocket, you can strike enough to score.  This is why I believe heavier single void pins should be only part of the equation in solving our scoring problems.



 



Jerry Weller

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #8 on: May 04, 2003, 11:45:33 PM »
I've used a hard rubber ball in a league before and carried plenty of off hits with it on a house shot provided the backends were stripped.

I still think the lane conditions are the most critical factor in the high scores. Put me on a shot where I can hit the pocket all day and sooner or later I'll match up the right speed and angle to shoot some big numbers even with a hard rubber ball.

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2003, 02:08:17 AM »
Perhaps a change in league formats could bring more diversity in lane conditions. Here in Sweden most leagues bring together teams from different towns and bowling centers. There are eight teams to a league, and often only one team per town and bowling center. Each team plays 7 home matches and 7 away matches. This often translates into differences in lane conditions since each center only caters to one home team. You can find a shot going 15 to 5 in one center, only to find a gutter shot the only way to score in the next one. The teams that are most versatile in handling different lane conditions usually prevail. Don't you have this king of leagues in the US at all?

Tournaments seem to be a smaller problem. Or are they?

Regards,


--------------------
jensm
Regards,

jensm

Jerry Weller

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2003, 02:27:58 AM »
We have travelling leagues jensm where bowlers bowl in different houses different weeks, but from what I've heard about your conditions from the people at the Foundation who set up tournaments over there, your "house shot" is a lot tougher than the walls that most Americans compete on.

Proprietors here know that we are used to and like to get high scores and they do their best to make the shot as easy as they can legally get away with to keep us coming back.

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2003, 05:54:36 AM »
Jerry,

I would guess that christmas tree patterns are most prevalent here in Sweden. One or two of the centers in my league put out shots that kind of guided the ball to the pocket. The other ones required a bit more precision and versatility.

I have played a couple of the tournaments here on which lanemen from Kegel have been responsible for lane conditioning. These conditions generally transition more than league conditions. But that's not unusual in tournaments.

Regards,

--------------------
jensm
Regards,

jensm

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2003, 07:07:22 AM »
Soft corners were a part of the game back in the seventies when I started. I learned to stroke the ball because that was what worked. With today's material, I can hit the ball much harder because I know that it will find friction when I need it. The best thing I could do on oily conditions back then was to increase the angle to the pocket and play a straight line. Today it's easier to carry well without increasing the angle to the pocket.

Perhaps the combination of walled league shots and strong bowling balls may give the impression that this is all there is to bowling today. But there's more, trust me.

Regards,
--------------------
jensm
Regards,

jensm

NevadaBowl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2003, 01:11:36 PM »
Certainly it is a different game than it was in the 80s.  Better or worse can be left to the philosophers.  But why aren't we all getting multiple 300s, averaging 240 or 250?  Because each era of the game has its own challenges.  If you matched up in the 80s with your particular lane, you were going to score.  Just like now.  

I think there are more choices available, especially if you have been bowling a long time and have some urethane stuff in the closet.  Keeping track of those choices is a difficult task.  You still have to pick the right ball, you still have to roll it to score, and you still have to make spares.

Is it perfect?  No.  But I heard the same arguments in the 1980s, arguing about this or about that.  Does anyone remember when 'short oil' was introduced by the ABC in about 1986 or 7?  Half of the house was cheering, half was crying.  Not as much has changed as we think.

On a related note, I was bowling with a PWBA ex-player of the year a few years ago in a Pro-Am, and I asked her, "Is Sport bowling the answer?"  She said, "No, heavier pins would do the trick."

michelle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4913
Re: RE: The good old days
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2003, 01:14:36 PM »
quote:
If you use the same ball on both a sport condition and on a wall supposedly your average will be about 30 pins different.  If that is true, how can you say the problem is primarily the equipment?  There are enough balls on the market that someone should have found the right combination to average 230 on the sport shot.  



I've not seen any claims that the same ball would result in the 30 pin difference.  The claim between sport and wall bowling is that the more inconsistent one is at hitting their mark the more their average would be expected to drop, and that many bowlers would expect to see a decrease of roughly 30 pins per game in the beginning.  

The other factor to remember is that not all sport-compliant conditions are created equally...they can run the gamut from reverse block to flooded to relatively dry.