Have a question about our recently completed city tournament. My doubles partner and I were in first until this last weekend before we were edged by another pair by 4 pins. We were bowling scratch and somehow this other team got 10 pins of handicap for the set. Last year one of them averaged 217, and the other averaged 219 (handicap based 90% of 220, so it was calculated correctly). However, the year prior, the guy at 217 averaged 233, I saw him shoot 877 and a couple sets over 840. Not sure how he had that rough of a year last year, but that's beside the point.
This year he's averaging 225 . . in the same league that reports regularly to the USBC (that he had 233 in two years ago and 217 a year ago). He also bowls in 3 other leagues in another town that haven't reported any averages to USBC for 2014/2015 yet, one of which he's averaging 227 in. We have a 10 pin rule in our city tournament. I realize it would have had to be 227 or higher at the time of the cutoff for averages, as the 227 is a current average. However, when I inquired with our association heads about checking into it, the answer I got initially is that since it's a local tournament, they have never considered outside averages before.
While that sounds logical or reasonable, aren't sanctioned tournaments required to take the highest sanctioned average period? I'm not sure I want to make a huge issue out of this, the guys that beat us are friends, and I know for a certain fact they weren't trying to cheat, might have just been an oversight, maybe he wasn't 227 at the time, or maybe they also assumed it was just based on city only averages. Everybody has rough years, but this guy shouldn't ever get handicap anywhere . . and if it was the difference between 4th and 5th I wouldn't care or say a word, but it's for 1st. I also know that if the roles were reversed, and they got edged by us and they found out we were getting handicap, they'd be doing the same thing, because we shouldn't be getting handicap together either.
Again, don't want to cause an issue, and definitely don't want it to get them disqualified, just re-rated. If they had just blown us out of the water, this wouldn't be an issue haha . .