BallReviews
General Category => Miscellaneous => Topic started by: bowl400 on June 26, 2008, 09:49:07 AM
-
wondering how many bowlers purposely bowl in a tough house in order to gain an advantage when they bowl handicapped tournaments. i noticed the leader at a local tournament who averaged over 200 at an easier house 3 years ago, but posted averages the last two years around 180 at a well known tough center. many of these bowlers also do well in the state tournament every year using those low averages. sounds like the way to go!
--------------------
Tag Team Coaching success story
-
nah not me, i like having a high average because i know i can pull 180's on sport shots in tournaments.
--------------------
Im so glad people are brainwashed to thinking that if they buy a new ball they will carry everything. And its even funnier when im carrying with my 15 year old ball and they're going flat ten.
-
Only bowling at a tough house and averaging lower is perfectly acceptable.
It just shows the lack of uniformity in bowling, and that something should be done.
-
Too many, but we rerated one this season, so its not the be all end all of how to sandbag. Took years of history on this bowler in multiple associations, leagues and tournaments. So its not easy or quickly done. Keep in mind that these are bowlers that hit 2 to 4 tournaments a month, its like a second job and income for them.
Purposely keeping your average low for the purpose of entering handicapped tournaments is not right. No matter if you bowl in a tough house or not.
Erin
-
Im sure everybody has access to a tougher house. It may require a little driving, but everybody can bowl in a tough house. People don't want a tough house, they want to stay home and bowl on their cake china wall shot. Then they enter a handicap tournament, and complain that people are averaging lower then them by bowling in a tough house.
Solution..........................Bowl Scratch
-
Bowling at a harder house because you want a challenge or because you're tired of the "stand left, throw right" mentality no problem. Going to a hard house to gain an advantage in handicap tournaments IS sandbagging and although nothing will be done 99% of the time, is still illegal. It all depends on intent.
--------------------
Penn State Proud
Special thanks to Lane#1 for donations to two consecutive Ballreviews Get Togethers.
Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive (http://"http://www.bowl4fun.com/ron/roncarchive.htm")
-
There is nothing illegal about bowling in a tougher house and gaining an advantage for tourny's. As long as your trying your hardest in the tougher house, it's not sandbagging. Some people don't have access to the easier shot, and those that focus their game on the tougher shots deserve to be rewarded. Somebody has to give the Sandbaggers competition.
-
quote:
There is nothing illegal about bowling in a tougher house and gaining an advantage for tourny's. As long as your trying your hardest in the tougher house, it's not sandbagging. Some people don't have access to the easier shot, and those that focus their game on the tougher shots deserve to be rewarded. Somebody has to give the Sandbaggers competition.
Sorry, if your intent for switching houses (which is how the original post is phrased) is to gain an advantage in handicap tournaments, it is the definition of sand bagging. Not trying or throwing off is the more often used and more blatant form, but anything you do purposely to gain an advantage is bagging. Like I said, if you're bowling the harder house for any other reason it's not a problem. If you only move to get sticks in a handicap tournament, it's bagging.
--------------------
Penn State Proud
Special thanks to Lane#1 for donations to two consecutive Ballreviews Get Togethers.
Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive (http://"http://www.bowl4fun.com/ron/roncarchive.htm")
-
quote:
slap the dime
year to year I bowl in 3 or 4 leagues and normally come out winning a total of about $1800-$2000. Alright at best.... this past year I tried something different. I sandbagged for half of the season and went nuts increasing my averages in my 3 leagues a total of 47 pins from the half way point on. I won $4000 instead. I still have decently high entering averages for next year but hey you have to reestablish in all leagues, dont you?!?! There is no prestige in averaging high unless you are head and shoulders above the rest and by me you need to be 245 to do that so sandbagging it is!!!!
Care to share your name or national ID number so we can pass that information to the USBC? Sand bagging is normally hard to prove, but if you're going to be so forth coming with information and proud of your "efforts", you need to go.
--------------------
Penn State Proud
Special thanks to Lane#1 for donations to two consecutive Ballreviews Get Togethers.
Ron Clifton's Bowling Tip Archive (http://"http://www.bowl4fun.com/ron/roncarchive.htm")
Edited on 6/27/2008 5:57 AM
-
im pretty sure im not the only one that thinks that bowling should go back to being all scratch. then we'd truly see who the "top notch" bowlers are at tournaments, not the baggers
--------------------
John
Better Bowling Pro Shops Inc Staff
-
we don't have a problem here with it
but we have a small tournament base after 4 tournaments bowlers
uses tournament average and at end of season starts with tourney
average next year unless league average higher stops all that
and if league average gets 10 pin higher that counts to.
no handicap bowlers gets a advantage more scratch bowlers
are winning, but any bowler can get hot for 6 games.
-
quote:
wondering how many bowlers purposely bowl in a tough house in order to gain an advantage when they bowl handicapped tournaments. i noticed the leader at a local tournament who averaged over 200 at an easier house 3 years ago, but posted averages the last two years around 180 at a well known tough center. many of these bowlers also do well in the state tournament every year using those low averages. sounds like the way to go!
--------------------
Tag Team Coaching success story 
I know at least 8 bowlers who do that around here. They play at a house where conditions are kept tough for that purpose. Those guys where bowling over 200 avg at other houses but they post averages in the 180's now in handicapped tournaments. This brings me to suggest that tournaments should be played on sports shots.
-
I worked the bracket table at our state tournament for the past 6 weekends and I saw a lot of questionable stuff during that time. We had a few bowlers come in from Blythe, California and most of them were in the 160-170 average range and ended up shooting low 600's in their doubles and singles events. While I was collecting scores for the brackets, I had the opportunity to talk to them and found out that they bowl in a total dump back home and were so pleased to be able to bowl in a house that had new lanes, approaches and that the lanes actually had oil on them. I don't see purposely bowling in a tough house as sandbagging as long as you are trying to do your best.
-
I like how that guy just completely admitted to being a sandbagger.
As for bowling in a tough house for tournament sake, that seems alright. I bowl at a somewhat tougher house than the other houses around my area to make myself a more consistent bowler, and it's been showing in the tournaments I've done. Not shooting lights out, but I've cashed more often than I ever have this season, so that makes me happy
--------------------
Obviously, you aren't a golfer.
Check out this blog (http://"http://astronsolutionsworldofhr.blogspot.com/")
-
The problem with bowling at a tougher house means I am no longer qualified to discuss drillings or balls on this site.
The fact that once in weekend tournies for money I often average over 200 just because I all of sudden remember to practice my spares which I can't make without lots of practice(klutz)!
Such is today's downfall on ballreviews!
REgards,
Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
-
quote:
Sorry, if your intent for switching houses (which is how the original post is phrased) is to gain an advantage in handicap tournaments, it is the definition of sand bagging. Not trying or throwing off is the more often used and more blatant form, but anything you do purposely to gain an advantage is bagging. Like I said, if you're bowling the harder house for any other reason it's not a problem. If you only move to get sticks in a handicap tournament, it's bagging.
I have to agree that this is bagging, but by USBC rules it is not. If this person is bowling their best in the leagues they are in then they are NOT bagging. You can't force someone to be in a league with an easier shot.
The same applies to a bowler that uses only a plastic ball in a league and goes to tournaments with reactive. Is this bagging too? Even if the person admits it, there is nothing you can do.
Maybe have their average adjusted for tournaments but like someone stated earlier it has to be clearly obvious.
A guy with a 185 average goes to two or three tournaments a year and averages in those tournaments 210, 200, 230 is not going to get noticed. Why because it is possible for someone to shoot scores like that.
A guy with a 140 average and does the same thing...you might be able to get something done.
-
Here in my area, the cities best bowlers "All" bowl in the Travel League. For some who dont know about this league....its a league where you travel and bowl at different houses around the Metro city. Sometimes every week, most times every two weeks. Six games are bowled, with a max of 8 or 9 bowlers per team.
I said that to say this....Some of those bowlers "only" bowl in that league to keep there averages down. Sandbagging in this league is an understatement. These bowlers who would avg. about 215 or 225 in one house, will avg. about 180 in the Travel League. Dont get me wrong, the Travel League can be tough, but not 180 tough.
When its time for a tournament, they come in with there 180 avg. and just rip the place apart. Is it fair?...Well, USBC says yes, but there needs to be some governing on this issue. Its getting out of hand in my opionion.
Earl
Edited on 6/27/2008 10:48 AM
-
The only governing you can do on this issue is to create uniform lane patterns, so this way you can no longer have easy cake china shots. The problem then becomes enforcing it.
-
Tenpin, I agree with you 100%. The problem with that is....if you make the shot too tough, then you have the avg. mom and pop bowler 'who bowls for fun and beer only" to complain to management. Then you have people frustrated, and discourage about bowling in this particular house that has uniformed patterns.
I hear what you`re saying, Ive ask that question to center owners before. Their answer was basically, "I dont want to run off my paying customers". I cant say that I blame them, Its a catch-22 situation I believe.
Earl
-
I sucked bad enough this year at a house I use to average 200 in over the previous two seasons. There's no point in sandbagging.

--------------------
Ken
Videos at http://www.putfile.com/k-dawg77
http://www.myspace.com/lefthandedhammerpride
http://khlthe2nd.bowlspace.com
http://members.bowl.com/FindAMember/memberView.aspx?mp=418&ms=2006&s=2006-2007
-
Some of you aren't reading what's written. If the INTENT of switching houses was to get more HANDICAP, it's sand bagging. If the handicap wasn't the reason for the switch, there's no foul.
--------------------
Telling it like it is.
-
I can see both sides of this discussion.
If someone bowls in a tougher house because they are trying to make themselves a better bowler that does not make them a sandbagger IMO. Does this give them an advantage in tournaments maybe, but they still have to show up and bowl.
If a bowler moves to a tougher house and bowls their best but averages 20 pins less just to lower their averager for handicap tournaments, by USBC rules he is not a sandbagger. Do I feel that is fair? No, but there will always in any sport or game be those that purposely try to tip the scales in their favor.
Mark
-
Actually, an interesting solution to this would be going to an indexing system like golf does with golf courses and player's handicaps. Once a month the bowling center sends in a tape of their house shot, and USBC gives it a "difficulty" index. Then over the season they avg the index together for the months that the league bowled and apply it to all avg's that came out of that house for said months.
You will never have uniformity among houses, but that might be a way to allow for the differences and create less uprising while keeping people in check.
--------------------
First one to leave 15 ten pins wins!
-
What ever happened to just showing up and trying to score the highest you can every time? That is what I do. avg be damned. Whether is it a THS or a PBA league, or a local tourney. I try to throw the best ball I can every shot and score the highest I can everytime.
Like Billy Chapel says, For Love of the Game.
--------------------
Speed Kills
When in doubt, move out
-
quote:
What ever happened to just showing up and trying to score the highest you can every time? That is what I do. avg be damned. Whether is it a THS or a PBA league, or a local tourney. I try to throw the best ball I can every shot and score the highest I can everytime.
That is what is happenning in the scenario described by the person who started the topic. They are going to another house knowing their average will be lower thus giving them more handicap. They are trying their best however the shot is tougher so their average is lower. Some think they are sandbagging and it is wrong for them to do it.
-
This is what I don't understand and I think things need to change:
Bowler 1: THS Average - 190, Sport Average - 160
Bowler 2: THS Average - 220, Sport Average - 190
Bowler 1 bowls in THS and Sport League. Goes to handicap tournament (uses a shot tougher than THS) and must use their THS Avg.
Bowler 2 bowls in Sport League but THS league is non-sanctioned. Goes to same tournament and is using their 190 average.
In this scenario Bowler 2's average for tournament is closer and more correct. Bowler 1 has put himself at a disadvantage. In reality why would Bowler 1 want to enter tournament where he knows he is going up against people like Bowler 2. It's NOT right! The system does NOT work.
Average is NOT indication of someone's ability in bowling anymore. It's apples to oranges. A check needs to be put in place.