win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: USBC and possible rules change  (Read 1063 times)

Strike300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
USBC and possible rules change
« on: February 04, 2005, 02:55:43 PM »
Got this from a post by another guy. Could it be true?

Evening the Score
By: Dick Evans
The new United States Bowling Congress is going to attempt to bring astronomical scores back down to earth with a new ball rule.

If the change works the way the USBC anticipates, then it will be tougher to string strikes and shoot big scores with new bowling balls.

So, I suggest that all high average bowlers in Volusia County rush out and buy all of the bowling balls currently being sold in pro shops. Also, it wouldn't hurt to dust off a high-performance ball that you may have stopped using. The reason for haste - all bowling balls produced before Feb. 1 will be grandfathered in.

The USBC is hoping to curtail scoring by forcing bowling ball manufacturers to make changes. It's a mandate since the USBC has the power to throw out any record score achieved with a non-approved bowling ball.

The change involves the Radius of Gyration (RG) Differential, which means the maximum RG differential on new balls will go from 0.090 inches to 0.060 inches starting Feb. 1. Balls produced before Feb. 1 will be grandfathered in so that's why it will pay to buy new equipment now.

"In more bowling friendly terms, bowling ball flare and entry angle will be controlled," said Jim Jaryszak, USBC senior technician who is in charge of
testing bowling balls in Greendale, Wis. Research at the eight-lane, climate-controlled building has proved that the greater angle into the strike pocket, the more strikes. In other words, if you go straight up the boards into the pocket you are going to throw fewer strikes than if a right-hander & sends the ball right toward the gutter, and then about 40 feet down the lane the ball makes a severe left turn back into the strike pocket.

The word flare may confuse some people unless you go down to the fourth meaning listed by the Webster New World Dictionary - "a curving or spreading outwards."

After talking to the experts in Greendale I came up with this conception for their use of the word flare - the ball is rolling and curving at the same time it is moving from one side to the other on its 60-foot journey down a lane. Therefore, instead of having a customary one ring of oil it may have many.

"We have been looking at making this change for quite some time," said Neil Stremmel, USBC director of research. "This is a big step, and we plan for this to be part of some big picture changes in the future."

Back in 1984 the American Bowling Congress attempted to curtail high scoring by adding a few ounces to the weight of each pin, raising the minimum to three pounds six ounces per pin.
Don Carter, a successful bowling proprietor and the man many consider the greatest bowler in history, complained at the time that the slightly heavier pins would hurt the low-average bowlers with the 10-pound balls and not the power bowlers with 16-pound missiles.

He was right about the power bowlers - their scores and averages have skyrocketed with each passing year.

So, I approached Roger Dalkin, a former North Miami High bowler and the CEO of the new USBC, and asked him if he thought the new ball specification change would impact the lower-average bowler.

"I would say it should have little or no impact on the average or lower-average players," Dalkin said. "The specification deals with the ball track and the accompanying potential hook.

"Average and lower-average players' probably do not have the learned skills to achieve any advantage from the extreme flare which this new specification limits.

"Accuracy and repeatability of shots are far more important to the average and low-average player."


 

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2005, 10:59:41 PM »
No, it's not true.  I don't think the maximum allowable RG differential was ever 0.090.  
--------------------
"Dispensing conventional wisdom to a fingertip world."

Horrid in Doubles, torrid in Singles...
...that's The Curse of Dusty.
#TweetYourScores

Strike300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2005, 11:03:15 PM »
Ok I'm not all into ball specs so I don't know that much. Guess I was hoping that those crankers that sprayed the lanes would have to actually hit a narrower target to beat me.  

Bill Thomas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 692
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2005, 06:04:11 AM »
I agree with Liquid Tension.  Its looks to me as if USBC is using some smoke and mirrors to make it look as though they are doing something to restore integrity to bowling.  It will take a lot more than this!

south fl bowler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 111
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2005, 06:27:26 AM »
i think a lower diff will help maybe something closer
to .040 and eliminate particles so the balls aren't
tearing up the lane surface
just my 2 cents
--------------------
check that rack

CUBS WIN!!!!!!!!!

DanH78

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3913
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #5 on: February 05, 2005, 03:07:53 PM »
Well, they have to start with something, don't they?  

Considering all the whining that goes on over any and all rule changes, I can't imagine what would happen if the first rule change had to do with lane conditions or coverstocks.  

I'm sure everyone who complains about the USBC doing a bad job is doing all they can to get involved at the local and national level to help out.
--------------------
The clock on the wall says 3 O'Clock...last call...for Alcohol!
"I love a martini -- but two at the most. Three I’m under the table; Four, I’m under the host."  Dorothy Parker
#10

Tex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1107
Re: USBC and possible rules change
« Reply #6 on: February 05, 2005, 10:29:23 PM »
Columbia has already proven that differential of less that .060 will not make a difference. The whole Bully family has less than .050 and they all hook. In fact the Big Bully is the strongest in the line and it is at .048 I think. They tried the same thing a couple years ago by lowering the coefficient of friction. The Bully's are not even particle and same is true for the hottest Brunswick stuff. Companies just found solid or pearl coverstocks that hooked as much without the friction.