win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Silly question...  (Read 3854 times)

L3nn0n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Silly question...
« on: February 03, 2015, 08:03:19 PM »
I just got a new Sigma Sting and I used it for 9 games in three different house centers. I'm still finding myself how to throw/use this ball. Before the Sigma I was using an Aura Paranormal as my "out of the box" ball with pretty good results.

The weird thing is that the even when the Sigma is supposed to be a weaker ball than the Aura. The Sigma overhooks too much and I need to move to the right (I'm a lefty) and also I need to open the lane in order to hit the pocket while with the Aura I can throw more straight and hit the pocket.

The question is: Can a medium oil ball be stronger than a medium/heavy oil ball? The Aura is smoother than the Sigma. But you get my point right? I thought that every single ball designed for heavy/medium oil would be stronger than one designed for medium conditions.

Am I wrong or right?

Thanks in advance!
« Last Edit: February 03, 2015, 08:05:14 PM by L3nn0n »
Logged

 

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2015, 08:14:35 PM »
Sigma is a strong ball. There are lots of difference between the two bowling balls and their intended purpose. 

Likely number of games between the two along with difference in surface and layout will be the bigger determining factor.
Logged
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

vkowalski1970

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
  • "It is what it is"
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2015, 08:17:14 PM »
It's possible there is less oil than you think and the paranormal is burning up. A weaker ball will hook more on less oil. Now the Sigma Sting is a strong ball but not as much of an oiler as the aura
Logged
Scandal
Daredevil Trick
IQ Tour Solid
Lights Out
Hustle Ink
Viral Hybrid

L3nn0n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2015, 09:34:12 PM »
Quote from: kidlost2000 on February 03, 2015, 08:14:35 PM
Sigma is a strong ball. There are lots of difference between the two bowling balls and their intended purpose. 

Likely number of games between the two along with difference in surface and layout will be the bigger determining factor.

I thought about that too. The Aura has been used for 10 months while the Sting is new. The thing that I got the Sigma because I wanted it to be my first ball and  i haven't figured out yet how to use it and be consistent.

Quote from: vkowalski1970 on February 03, 2015, 08:17:14 PM
It's possible there is less oil than you think and the paranormal is burning up. A weaker ball will hook more on less oil. Now the Sigma Sting is a strong ball but not as much of an oiler as the aura

So, a heavy ball used in less oil doesn't neccesarily overhooks? It can also look like a "dead" ball with almost no reaction?
Logged

vkowalski1970

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1431
  • "It is what it is"
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2015, 09:35:47 PM »
Yes! 
Logged
Scandal
Daredevil Trick
IQ Tour Solid
Lights Out
Hustle Ink
Viral Hybrid

L3nn0n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2015, 09:47:44 PM »
Quote from: vkowalski1970 on February 03, 2015, 09:35:47 PM
Yes!

Duh... I'm an idiot. I always thought that only a ball designed for medium or lighter conditions can look "dead" when used on a heavier pattern. I never thought the opposite.

I bowled tonight on a dry lane, was oiled yesterday and it was really tough to hit the pocket. I had to move 5 boards inside and had to go deep in order to open my angle, still I had some splits, but the Aura had almost no reaction, while the Sting was almost every shot high or a little high.

Well, I learned something new today and I bowled outside my confort zone and still hit 194 average after 6 games on wood lanes (which I never tried before) lol so I guess I'll take it.

Thank you Vince and kidlost2000!
Logged

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2015, 04:00:53 PM »
A lot  of possibilities here.  I have had pairs of balls where one hooked more on one condition and the other hooked more on another condition.  I wasn't about one burning either, just the way the different balls reacted to differing volumes, and even types of oils.  In this case I think the explanation above that the Sigma has a fresh shell compared to the older ball is the most likely explanation.  Look for the Sigma to tame down over time
Logged

L3nn0n

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 415
Re: Silly question...
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2015, 10:24:36 PM »
Quote from: avabob on February 04, 2015, 04:00:53 PM
A lot  of possibilities here.  I have had pairs of balls where one hooked more on one condition and the other hooked more on another condition.  I wasn't about one burning either, just the way the different balls reacted to differing volumes, and even types of oils.  In this case I think the explanation above that the Sigma has a fresh shell compared to the older ball is the most likely explanation.  Look for the Sigma to tame down over time

Thanks for your answer avabob. I also took the Sigma to 3000 and it hooks now just as much as I wanted to.  8)
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »