win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Solid Reactives  (Read 1937 times)

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Solid Reactives
« on: January 23, 2004, 03:09:56 AM »
It appears as though a whole bunch of strong, solid reactives are being released at the same time

Columbia Full Throttle
Brunswick Ultimate Inferno
Ebonite Killer Instinct (sanded)
Lane #1 Uranium Buzzsaw

From the descriptions (except for Lane #1 which didn't have much detail listed) the manufacturers claim that these are as strong or stronger than their own particles. This appears to be the next wave of products made for heavy oil. Is this the beginning of the end of particle technology?

 

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2004, 06:20:31 PM »
quote:
Is this the beginning of the end of particle technology?


I don't really think so.  Rather, it seems to me that these manufacturers are looking to provide offerings for oilier conditions that have a sharper reaction at the breakpoint than their particle offerings.  I can't speak for the other companies, but I've heard that the Ultimate Inferno is intended to complement rather than replace the Raging Inferno, and provide a reaction characteristic that isn't already in their line.
#TweetYourScores

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2004, 09:24:00 PM »
Interesting though that Big B rates the Ultimate stronger hooking than the Raging. If that's the case why bother witha particle?

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2004, 10:14:46 PM »

I haven't owned a solid non-particle ball, so let me ask a dumb question: Does the solid reactive such as the ones listed above hook later or sharper than the particles?  If these as you say "hook more" than the particles, what's the reaction like?
--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

RevLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 901
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2004, 10:15:45 PM »
in my opinion if you have a good amount of revs, you shouldnt be throwing particles that are heavy loa anyway you wont get then to move cause they burn them up in the heads and they just die in the back, that from personal experience though. i like the solid reatives havent had much luck with med to heavy particle balls.

pjr300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1487
  • Live from the Bowling Capital of the World!
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2004, 10:26:48 PM »

There's a few houses in my area that consistantly put out a heavy oil shot... dull particles are the norm and very acceptable. If I take a ball I use at that house (Apex Aggression, Track Freak) out of the bag at som of my other houses, it's likely to make it 30 feet down the lane before hooking into the left gutter!

--------------------
pjr300
live from the Bowling Capital of the World
pjr300
Specs and Transaction history in my profile...

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2004, 10:40:41 PM »
pjr300, if you go to Big B they think that the Ultimate hooks very slightly sooner and slightly more arcy BUT harder, than the Raging. The Raging, because it's polished and because it's a particle, goes a little longer but has a more angular entry.  My read from what I see is that these new solid reactives have a very hard, continuous arc.  The strength of the cover (and core) makes me think that they would be more predictable than particles and less susceptible to over/under. I'm sure that someone that knows WAY more than me about this stuff might see it differently and maybe can explain it better than me.

golfnutFL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2111
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2004, 10:42:19 PM »
pjr300, I think that unless you have heavy, or at least med. heavy (or little hand) that these balls would not match up well.

RSalas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4058
Re: Solid Reactives
« Reply #8 on: January 24, 2004, 12:43:46 PM »
quote:
Interesting though that Big B rates the Ultimate stronger hooking than the Raging. If that's the case why bother witha particle?


Particles burn energy more evenly going down the lane, and I've found this to be helpful when I want to smooth out the reaction from front to back or when I have to play the lanes tighter.  However, I've also found that there's nothing quite like a solid reactive to open up a fresher condition because of the sharper reaction off of the dry boards.  I could thus make a case for carrying both the Raging and the Ultimate in the bag because of the different looks they give me.
#TweetYourScores