I think everyone else has the wrong idea of this post. Neither one of us are trying to split boards on a house shot, just merely get into a zone where we can strike as freely as the next guy and hope to make some money back. It's almost impossible in this age of modern technology and equipment for the elite player(which I am not saying that I am, I'm far from it) to win deservingly a majority of the time.
Coached, seasoned, and most players are taught these things about the game:
1) throw a shot and read the length, volume, and shape of the pattern
2) match up ball-x, with drill-x, and surface-x and find a suitable line on the lane for desired reaction
3) hit location-x with a free swing, little to no grab at the release point, and a solid trajectory
4) watch the ball through its path, read its transition and see the final result
5) as the shots go on and lanes transition, move and adjust accordingly whether it be by release, ball changes, speed adjustments, lateral adjustments on the lane, while still maintaining consistant physical attributes
...now here is where the problem lies on these conditions:
1) The bowler with the trained eye in reading lane transitions, who can repeat their release, speed, and launch angle down to a tee has "closed their window" of room on the lane because throughout the years, all they've been taught about how to be great at this game does not apply to a shot that gives you 8-10 boards of room at 30 feet to hit the pocket.
2) The bowler with the trained eye limits him/herself in margin for error right or left on the lane because their natural trajectory through the heads will not allow them to chickenwing, yank, or send a ball wide 8-10 inches wide in the early part of the lane to take advantage of the full miss room.
3) The bowler with the most consistant release will not see multiple reactions on the same shot from shot to shot. Theyare out of the ball so clean that it's almost impossible for them to put an extra or less 50-60 rpms on the ball or a few degrees or less tilt on the ball due to a release error or poor grip, unless they mean to do so on purpose from shot to shot.
4) We are all naturally looking for a certain "reaction shape" on the lanes, some people like the slow swooping arc, some like the jerky skid/snap, some like a more controlled rounded motion. A player is naturally going to play the area on the lanes which gives them the motion that they can read and predict on the lanes by nature.
All of these things are taken away from the bowler on a house pattern that is changing every 3-5 frames because the pattern lends more to the guy that wants to stand in one entire spot for 3 games and throw the ball and throw 5 different shots which line up to the hole no matter what. You tell me who is going to see lane transition first:
-Bowler A who is playing a tight trajectory through the heads and playing 13-6 for 5 shots in a row and missing only a board right or left at any given time. Flushes a few shots and leaves a weak ten, followed by a high 4-9 that trips the 4 out, so now he's looking for a way to come back into the pocket flush.
or
-Bowler B who is playing a lanch angle of 7 boards wide in varying inconsistancies, and is striking solid in the pocket from 5 different spots on the lane
This is the main problem that I am seeing with house shots today, and Brian Voss and Johnny Petraglia basically said these things in numerous interviews on why the game has a problem at 'certain' levels. I don't think league bowling should be a grindfest, but at least have a shot that at least has to make you think. Something where repetition and smart transition moves can be rewarded and not punished. It's waaaaay too often that I find myself saying, or hear other bowlers saying:
"That ball didn't come back, I didn't send it far enough right" or, "I pulled that one 2 boards and came in the pocket light". What does that say about the condition that is out there on the lanes? It hasn't always been like this and it shouldn't be the norm for everywhere.
I guess I have a different view on things than alot of bowlers since I grew up playing the "3 main sports(basketball, baseball, football)" where the people that that always win(or most of the case) are the ones with the most solid attributes that plays their hardest, smartest, and best. Quality performance is always rewarded in these sports. It's just that there are so many variables in bowling that lead to so many odd circumstances happening. I honestly think that the only way to level the field would be either via equipment(balls & pins). Or standardized shot guidelines and qualifications at different tiers of competition.
There's gotta be someone else out there that agrees.....
--------------------
- DP3
Hoss Central Inc.
Respect the Game
"Only Chuck Norris can prevent forest fires."
Edited on 9/26/2006 2:00 PM