A strong layout gets the ball into its stable end roll quickly - and that can be a good option with a weak core/cover combo. That's what I would keep in kind when I chose the setup. A strong layout on a weak ball just defines the ball's utility - and you can actively exploit that.
Personally, I (still) have a Slate Blue Gargoyle which was drilled more or less 4x4 - pretty strong for a dry lane ball. I was scepctical first, but this setup helps the ball to finish well (I have rather medium revs and lower ball speed). The cover is so weak (still OOB after 4 years or so...) and it has little traction. On light oil and carrydown the ball would hardly function at all for me. But the strong layout stablizes its roll early, so that the breakpoint hazards are pretty small. On truly burnt lanes the ball will hook early, though, just as it is defined by the layout, but it is smooth and easy to control. And length is, thanks to the hard and non-porous shell, not an issue at all.
Besides the core influence on reaction, you still have to take into account the cover's responsiveness to friction. Just as CharlesT explained: a strong setup can help stablize the ball early. If you play with lots of side roll and aheva responsive cover, you might experience a jumpy breakpoint because the core is with a weaker layout still migrating towards its stable roll axis. A strong layout speeds this transition up.
Aside from that, 3.5" from PAP is a much different thing than 5". With the pin that close you get a strong axis layout, which gets the ball into a very early roll and an arcing hook. The 5" pin would go much longer and break much more sharply, probably needing lees head oil because of the delayed reaction. On a Slingshot, though, a 3,5" in would be a control ball option, esp. with higher ball speeds.
DizzyFugu - Reporting from Germany
2010/11 Benrather BC Club Champion
Confused by bowling? Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section