Author Topic: particle pearl coverstock question (Read 1085 times)

bobbo485 · « **on:** April 06, 2005, 11:22:34 AM »

i was wondering what were the benefits a particle pearl(say the storm ace) would have compared to normal particle coverstocks?

is it gonna flare more at the end like a pearl does in heavy oil? i have no clue and am interested in this ball.

any other input on either the storm ace or other particle pearls would be awesome!
--------------------
The Solid Ten- It keeps you up at nights sometimes.

thfonz98 · « **Reply #1 on:** April 06, 2005, 07:42:55 PM »

its a later reaction than particle, but earlier than reactive but not as much over under reaction like with reactive.....(overunder is move right through headpin, move in miss headpin type of reaction)...thus a little smoother off the dry compared to reactive.

according to bowling this month(iirc)
--------------------
YOU HAVE NO MARBLES!! - major league 2
F.O.S. Member....Proof

Edited on 4/6/2005 7:37 PM

BowlerKidR · « **Reply #2 on:** April 06, 2005, 08:16:22 PM »

its the same as all pearlised balls, it will store energy for the backend and then unleash, yet, it is particle so it wil bite through the mid-lane better and through the oil .
--------------------
"Strike for show, spare for dough"
I LIKE TO BOWL

Im A Hammer Head 100%

bobbo485 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 06, 2005, 08:26:06 PM »

ok....so how about this..

would a 1-2 punch of a storm ace and vertigo be a good medium-heavy combo?

both being drilled for earlier breakpoint? let me know hwat you think

--------------------
The Solid Ten- It keeps you up at nights sometimes.

Author Topic: particle pearl coverstock question (Read 1085 times)

bobbo485

particle pearl coverstock question

thfonz98

Re: particle pearl coverstock question

BowlerKidR

Re: particle pearl coverstock question

bobbo485

Re: particle pearl coverstock question