Looking for some thoughts and opinions here. If you were running a competitive scratch trio league where it's understood it's top heavy and not Mickey Mouse everyone gets the same at the end league. Say it comes out to $600 per person for a 30 week league.
Is it wrong to think first should pay at least $1200 per person, second $900, and third $600? I personally would view it as a very long competitive tournament, and who enters a tournament without being able to at least double their investment if winning it all?
While in handicap casual leagues, I prefer the more .... participatory distribution of the funds, in a true, no limit scratch league you should probably, to take your basic assumption to the same limit, pay only 1st, 2nd and 3rd place, in a distribution something like, 50% for first, 30% for second and 20% for third of the total prize fund. That's for 10 teams. If you had 25 teams, maybe you should pay out 5 places.
This is also assuming no team entry limit. True 100% scratch.