I SEEM to feel that plugging and re-drilling asymmetric cored balls are more prone to affecting the core''s dynamics than plugging & redrilling symmetric cored balls, but I do not know if it''s based on some logical but subconscious reason.

In other words, If you plug and re-drill an asymmetric/mass bias ball, do you run a greater risk of NOT having a good amount of the stock dynamics than you would with a symmetric cored ball?

This bothers me because I have no reason, based in physics (or Core Dynamics) for this assumption or feeling. It seems to me that it''s easier to destroy or have a greater affect on the dynamics of a mass bias ball than a symmetric cored ball.

Does anyone know of any physical reason for this to be true or false??
Or it it just luck or happenstance?

I wonder. I do not know. I''d like to know.

I''m not asking for your personal experience in redrilling mass bias balls. I have mine. We all have some. All the experience in the world does not really constitute proof, or a valid reason.

Thanks.
On edit: as Rico so appropriately put it, I should have phrased this: mass bias vs non-mass bias balls because there are symmetric mass bias balls and there are asymmetric non-mass bias balls.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Edited on 9/26/2009 8:38 PM

My opinion is not scientifically based but I will say that I bought a used T S&A from a person whose PAP was supposedly close to mine. I did know that a target X-hole was drilled into it but did not know that it was so deep.  A 1" hole drilled at least 2" deep was plugged and that ball always rolled like crap. After trying multiple surfaces and every hand position that I possess I gave up on it. I'd agree Jeff though I can't base my opinion on science.
--------------------
Scott