On a team where your third-highest bowler is a 160, I'm going to assume we're not talking about a high-dollar PBAX league here. Ergo, the 160 bowler should be good enough to lead off. Someone averaging 160 is probably going to have 2-3 opens a night but on a league like this, that wouldn't be enough to kill you. I guess we need some information on how that guy/girl shoots his/her 160s. A bunch of strikes and no spares? Or is it someone with decent accuracy that has trouble carrying the shot?
I'd still keep the two 190+ bowlers together at the bottom of the order. If you've got a 110 and 155 sandwiched in there, there isn't going to be a great deal of emotional "push" from having a 190-average bowler at the top filling frames. Whatever emotions he/she cranks out isn't going to have much effect on someone averaging 110 or 155.
Going back to the BTM article, they're advising your best bowler possibly be in the 4-hole, anyway. At the very least, your best bowler from a consistency standpoint. Moving that person up to 1 and putting a scattershot bowler in the 4-hole, IMO, doesn't fix much.
Jess