Flawed.
I just can't see the benefit of using a system to determine your team that isn't used anywhere in the World for any tournament that these guys will be bowling in.
Notes after two days...
*Kyle King would be the leader regardless if it was pts or total pins.
*Bradley Miller should is 2nd in total pins only 16 pins back, or one double in one game. But 6th in the standings and would need to beat the first place guy by 25 positions to take the lead. Not including the guys placed 2nd through 5th who he would also need to beat. So not only does he basically need to finish in the top 3 positions, but he also needs other people to bowl bad. So much for controlling your own destiny.
*Toby Sambueno who lead after day one would be in the top 10 in total pins aftert a disappointing, but not horrible day two. Instead, his 71st place finish in day 2 drops him to 27th overall position and literally out of contention. He's only 106 pins back of 1st place, but 62 pts or 62 positions over the next two days. The players he's lumped with in the 20's are an additional 70-100 pins back of the leader. Same for Jarret Mizo.
Why do people continue to frig with the game and how we determine winners and losers. I thought this game was about who knocked down the most pins. Not who bowled the most consistent. I haven't heard anything positive from the players I know bowling in this thing. What do you guys think?
PROFILE
340-370 revs
18 mph
230 book on THS
200 book on PBA
Arsenal: (In the bag) Nexus F(p+f), Nexus f(p), C-System Ulti-Max, Massive Damage, Damage. On the wall, Loaded Revolver, Lethal Revolver, Slingshot.
