win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: The Equipment Specifications Committee has ruled to suspend the three-unit rule.  (Read 5392 times)

Aloarjr810

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2149
  • Alley Katz Strike!
Short version is the USBC finally listened to everyone, studies the situation etc. and figured out the current lane dressing rules no longer work with todays ball technology. So they are suspending the 3 unit minimum rule and sitting back and watch what happens, then figure out what to do from there.


Excerpt:
SUMMARY
The research has shown the current lane dressing rules by USBC no longer are applicable because of advancements in technology.

The research and testing by the Equipment Specifications and Certifications team is an ongoing commitment to its educational effort and dedication to the idea that USBC needs to continually explore all facets in bowling while thinking about the future of the sport and the integrity of the competitions conducted in the sport.

 In addition to the research and data gathered,USBC believes the engagement of all stakeholders in these topics is extremely important to build a brighter future for the sport and a better USBC of which everyone can be proud.

I like this part here, It basically states what most of us already knew

The modern bowling balls drastically alter any oil pattern applied to a lane surface,to the extent that by the end of a league session the pattern is totally different than the starting pattern. Most patterns likely do not comply with the current three-unit rule,required at the time oil is applied, by the end of a league session.The existing enforcement policy of one inspection per year does little to ensure continuous compliance.

The ability to govern and uphold policies, the very reason for USBC’s existence, must be for meaningful cause with the ability for its governing body to enforce. The three-unit rule in the current environment no longer makes sense,and therefore,suspension or elimination of the rule is required


You can read the report here:
http://usbcongress.http.internapcdn.net/usbcongress/bowl/equipandspecs/pdfs/2019OilPatternReport.pdf
Aloarjr810
----------
Click For My Grip

 

The Bowling Pariah

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
  • THE TRUTH. DEAL WITH IT
SO,

 What do they do now? Let everyone dress the lanes however they see fit?
 (Which, by the way, most places are doing anyway)

 Maybe go to a % system where the driest part of the lane must have at least "X"% as much oil as the wettest part? (Or something similar maybe?)
The Ancient Evil Survives!

BowlingForDonuts

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1120
Plus most modern reactives have no problems hooking in 3 units of oil anyway. BPAA has all but told the USBC to butt out on THS oil patterns so this rule being suspended as implied will not change a thing.  Like tight static weight limits a relic of the past.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2019, 07:27:04 PM by BowlingForDonuts »
Here today.  Gone tomorrow.

ignitebowling

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1003
The list of things usbc cant monitor is much longer then just the 3 units of oil per board.  Slowly doing less for more
Ignite your game, and set the lanes on fire. www.facebook.com/ignitebowling  or @ignite_bowling

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
SO,

 What do they do now? Let everyone dress the lanes however they see fit?
 (Which, by the way, most places are doing anyway)

Q: What do you think every house does now?
A: Whatever they feel like doing or not doing.

Q: When was the last time you heard of any honor score being denied for that house not meeting oiling requirements?
A: 1942

Quote
Maybe go to a % system where the driest part of the lane must have at least "X"% as much oil as the wettest part? (Or something similar maybe?)

If they implement any requirements, then they'd have to monitor them. That is not happeneng.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4584
  • Former proshop worker
This is really non-news. Every since the 3 unit rule was put in place it was unenforceable.

When urethane became the lane surface of choice on wood, the even oil rule made lanes virtually unplayable. You were playing on US open conditions with rubber and plastic balls.

Owners of the centers, who have invested millions in today's dollars, were not going to have all their league bowlers quit so they started blocking the lanes.

Of course in the shellac and lacquer days lanes were blocked some as well but the track area was formed and pretty much dictated how you had to play the lanes and score.

So after being sued thousands of times for denying honor scores the ABC came out with short oil thinking that limiting the distance would would keep the block affect down but it didn't, scoring boomed. Certain styles could just kill short oil.

With new urethane and resin balls scores went even higher.

Eventually the ABC said UNCLE and put the 3 unit in which was essentially a invitation to block lanes.

Proprietors have always catered to the bowlers complaints, they have the money on the line, not the USBC.

Hell if they put down the amount of oil they did in the 70's non of the hook monsters today would work at all, they would roll out at the arrows. And bowlers complained to the owners that they couldn't use their new $200 hook monster, so they put out more oil to satisfy them and make others buy the new hook monsters.

Every change has helped some bowlers and styles and hurt others.

But money drives the game and always will.

BallReviews-Removed0385

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 0

USBC (Yawn)


avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
The 3 unit rule was promulgated prior to introduction of resin balls and prior to widespread use of sport patterns .  No real need for it, and truthfully a blend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry with no oil out to the gutter. 

Also that rule followed the short oil rule that prohibited buffing out past 24 feet unless a flat oil pattern was used.  When 3 units was introduced oil volumes were half what they are now, and 35 feet was considered a long pattern
« Last Edit: June 24, 2019, 10:24:40 AM by avabob »

tommygn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
  No real need for it, and truthfully a nlend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry

I find that USBC white pattern (6:1) ratio plays way easier than over walled house shot. It's more consistent, and the transition makes more sense.


Different take though and playing devils advocate; with no 3 unit rule, I think we may see houses experiment with even more drastic over walls, than we do now. For some reason, people seem to think a 15:1 puddle plays easier than a blend, which simply isn't true, unless you yank the ears off by the ball and miss by and arrow.

« Last Edit: June 24, 2019, 10:56:52 AM by tommygn »
God creates us with a blank canvas, and the "picture" we paint is up to us. Paint a picture you like and love!

tommygn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 694
Someone at USBC PPLLEEEAAASSSEEEE do the right thing and recognize Glenn Allison!!
God creates us with a blank canvas, and the "picture" we paint is up to us. Paint a picture you like and love!

Walking E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
  No real need for it, and truthfully a nlend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry

I find that USBC white pattern (6:1) ratio plays way easier than over walled house shot. It's more consistent, and the transition makes more sense.


Different take though and playing devils advocate; with no 3 unit rule, I think we may see houses experiment with even more drastic over walls, than we do now. For some reason, people seem to think a 15:1 puddle plays easier than a blend, which simply isn't true, unless you yank the ears off by the ball and miss by and arrow.



Agreed. High ratio or "cliffed" shots are good for fluffers or crackers, but usually very difficult for tweeners.

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
  No real need for it, and truthfully a nlend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry

I find that USBC white pattern (6:1) ratio plays way easier than over walled house shot. It's more consistent, and the transition makes more sense.


Different take though and playing devils advocate; with no 3 unit rule, I think we may see houses experiment with even more drastic over walls, than we do now. For some reason, people seem to think a 15:1 puddle plays easier than a blend, which simply isn't true, unless you yank the ears off by the ball and miss by and arrow.



Agreed. High ratio or "cliffed" shots are good for fluffers or crackers, but usually very difficult for tweeners.

I wouldn’t say very difficult. Annoying, yes. Very difficult? No
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
  No real need for it, and truthfully a nlend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry

I find that USBC white pattern (6:1) ratio plays way easier than over walled house shot. It's more consistent, and the transition makes more sense.


Different take though and playing devils advocate; with no 3 unit rule, I think we may see houses experiment with even more drastic over walls, than we do now. For some reason, people seem to think a 15:1 puddle plays easier than a blend, which simply isn't true, unless you yank the ears off by the ball and miss by and arrow.



Agreed. High ratio or "cliffed" shots are good for fluffers or crackers, but usually very difficult for tweeners.

I wouldn’t say very difficult. Annoying, yes. Very difficult? No

Agreed. I learned to adapt to the playing field. Lower flaring balls with control it (am I showing my age?) let me stand where the dumpers play and my average went up 20 pins.

tburky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
Well blended house shots always play better than over walled wet/dry. Exception to that may be the topography towards the outside

Walking E

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2101
  No real need for it, and truthfully a nlend out to 3 units is probably easier than a wet dry

I find that USBC white pattern (6:1) ratio plays way easier than over walled house shot. It's more consistent, and the transition makes more sense.


Different take though and playing devils advocate; with no 3 unit rule, I think we may see houses experiment with even more drastic over walls, than we do now. For some reason, people seem to think a 15:1 puddle plays easier than a blend, which simply isn't true, unless you yank the ears off by the ball and miss by and arrow.



Agreed. High ratio or "cliffed" shots are good for fluffers or crackers, but usually very difficult for tweeners.

I wouldn’t say very difficult. Annoying, yes. Very difficult? No

Agreed. I learned to adapt to the playing field. Lower flaring balls with control it (am I showing my age?) let me stand where the dumpers play and my

 average went up 20 pins.

Next time I'll have to try that. Normally for me it's a drastic case of over-under hell due to too many revs for the dirt, but not nearly enough for the oil.