win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: The newest 900  (Read 4530 times)

LuvThatWhiteDot

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3025
The newest 900
« on: August 19, 2004, 08:24:11 AM »
Press Release from ABC:

AMERICAN BOWLING CONGRESS APPROVES 900 SERIES BY PENNSYLVANIA'S JEFF CAMPBELL IIGREENDALE, Wis. - The American Bowling Congress has approved the three-game 900 series rolled June 12 by Jeff Campbell II in New Castle, Pa.

It is the sixth approved 900 in ABC history.Campbell, a 22-year-old student at West Texas A&M University, rolled three consecutive perfect games in the first three games of a pre-bowled four-game block in the Shenango Doubles Mixed League at Colonial Lanes.  His fourth game was 216. While the league is based at Shenango Lanes, bowlers are allowed to pre-bowl at either Shenango or Colonial Lanes in accordance with league rules.

Because Campbell's score was not bowled in the normal league setting, ABC officials took additional time to ensure the circumstances under which the score was bowled also complied with ABC rules. "Because Jeff rolled his 900 in a pre-bowled situation, we took extra care in our review of the accomplishment," said ABC Assistant Executive Director Jack Mordini. "We found no conflict with league or ABC rules and congratulate Jeff for taking his place in bowling history."  Campbell's series was the first 900 in more than three years.

Previous 900 shooters were Jeremy Sonnenfeld in Lincoln, Neb., in 1997; Tony Roventini in Milwaukee in 1998; Vince Wood in Moreno Valley, Calif., in 1999; Robby Portalatin in Jackson, Mich., in 2000 and James Hylton in Salem, Ore., in 2001.

--------------------
White Dot
You don't need to be a zoologist to recognize a jackass.
http://bowlingfans.com/league


 

snowgimp

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2004, 02:49:17 PM »
I was 7 months old when Allison shot 900, but we were living in the area and I recall my dad telling me what he heard the reason for the non-sanctioning was not *really* due to easy conditions (the rest of the league was under average) but because he was involved in some sort of adult establishment that the local association did not agree with.  This may not be the case, but it's just the legend I've heard.  Blocked lanes or not how many 900's have you got shotmaker?  It's an accomplishment regaurdless, and Glen's should have been, and still should be recognized.  There's no way Jeremy "I can't get the grades up at UNL" Sonnenfeld should be referred to as Mr. 900.

LuckyLefty

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17348
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #17 on: August 21, 2004, 03:06:05 PM »
I know this, these babies bring out the obsessions for this game.

The bottom line is this.  These are incredible accomplishments, every bowler that has done it is not a slouch most of them 220 and over type of players if not 230 and they were all very good or great before they did this!  There is some carry involved there has to be.

And each of them faced a lot of pressure and yet got thru it and did it!  I wish I was there or did it myself!!!  Three Cheers!

REgards,

Luckylefty
PS years ago a guy named Tom Doty a PGA pro but NOT pro tour material shot either 55 or 54 in golf for 18 holes on a regulation course.
It was incredible.  For one stretch he shot 1,1,2,2 and was 10 under par on those 4 holes.  It was not on a pro tour course!  No one obsessed over how hard the course was, no one complained it was the world record.  Kudos abounded!
Get with the program!!!  KUDOS!!!
It takes Courage to have Faith, and Faith to have Courage.

James M. McCurley, New Orleans, Louisiana

stormerjip

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1163
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #18 on: August 22, 2004, 01:45:54 AM »
could anyone tell me is this the same jeff cambell that went to a different college last year.  Cause I went to college lst year and had same major as a jeff cambell from penn
show no mercy, kill the wounded, eat the dead

stormerjip

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1163
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #19 on: August 22, 2004, 01:51:23 AM »
Im about 99% sure this was him and he attended vincennes university in vincennes indiana i believe cause he has same name and same town
show no mercy, kill the wounded, eat the dead

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2004, 02:18:57 AM »
H ewent to Vincenneces last year.  he just transferred to West Texas A&M for his final year of Eligibility.
--------------------
-DJ Marshall
You're not Bowling if you're not using "B"runswick
Scratchbowling.com

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #21 on: August 24, 2004, 02:53:49 PM »
Have any of the 900’s that have been shot and sanctioned been bowled with 5 person teams on both lanes? Or even 4 person teams?

I’m pretty sure Sonnenfeld’s was in some singles tournament situation and bowled on a different pair each lanes each game.

Roventini was also in a singles tournament and I believe he was moving pairs each game as well. If I remember right he shot another (a fourth) 300 that same day.

I don’t know about the others.

Now this current one was bowled by himself on a pair.

It seems Allison’s was bowled on a classic 5 person team league.

Not trying to diminish the accomplishment, it something I could never do and would probably tinkle down my leg trying to throw the last ball, but it will be interesting to see if anyone ever does it in 5 person team situation. If someone has then my hat's off to them.

I’m always more impressed by bowlers who throw 800’s in 5 person team play rather than leagues with 2 or 3 person teams.

I feel the proliferation of smaller team sized leagues is one the reasons behind the proliferation of honor scores in recent years.

bowl400

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #22 on: August 24, 2004, 03:17:10 PM »
couple of years ago, the 5 person team i bowled on, prebowled on a different night, time, and lanes because some of the guys were going to vegas for some megabuck event.  we did not bowl particularly well so we figured that we would be lucky to get one point for the night.  well, as it turns out, the league session where our pre-bowl was to apply, the lane machine broke down and the shot for that night only was extremely difficult.  even with our poor scores, we won 3 of 4 points (2 games + total).  the other team protested that we did not bowl under the same conditions.  here is the killer.  when we asked the abc to intervene, they said that they could not, it should be handled by the league.  so we had to bowl that team again on the same night as league, but after.  anyway, the good news is we won 2 points (2 games but lost total).  the point is that, it does not seem possible that the guy shot 900 on the same conditions as league.  just my 2 cents.

Pinbuster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
  • Former proshop worker
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #23 on: August 24, 2004, 03:37:41 PM »
Bowl400 – I’m making no comment on the conditions he bowled. To carry 36 in a row is an incredible feat. In this particular case he did not even bowl in the same house where the league is housed but league rules allowed him to bowl at his alternate house.

My point is as hard as this is to do (shoot 900) it is exponentially harder the more bowlers you added to the mix and I’m unaware of anyone shooting 900 bowling on 5 person teams.

At the ABC national tournament the first 300 bowled in the team event did not occur until the late 1970’s. I’m sure there are 10+ honor scores shot during doubles and singles for each bowled in the team event.  

bowl400

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 667
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #24 on: August 24, 2004, 04:54:40 PM »
i agree, 36 in a row any time is truly amazing.  i also believe that glenn allison should be recognized for his achievement.  i thought he was robbed then.  however, how about this situation.  league bowls on tough 2nd shift condition.  team pre-bowls on easier 1st shift condition and shoots big numbers.  i am not sure that the team that they would have bowled would appreciate that (i know, my teams have been on the short end more than a few times).  as you can tell, i am not a fan of unopposed pre or post bowling.  if the other team is willing to show up and bowl, then at least the other team would have something to do with the results.

clintdaley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4246
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #25 on: August 24, 2004, 05:03:51 PM »
I bowled with Jeff 2 years ago in a Scratch league we had to be drafted into to get on a team (no guarantee you will bowl until you get drafted, some people went home every year). Jeff has an awesome game and is quite a gentleman.

Clint Daley-Owner
Lets Go Bowling Daley
Salem, Ohio 44460










Platinum Bowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1669
Re: The newest 900
« Reply #26 on: August 25, 2004, 09:47:17 PM »
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Have any of the 900’s that have been shot and sanctioned been bowled with 5 person teams on both lanes? Or even 4 person teams?

I’m pretty sure Sonnenfeld’s was in some singles tournament situation and bowled on a different pair each lanes each game.

Roventini was also in a singles tournament and I believe he was moving pairs each game as well. If I remember right he shot another (a fourth) 300 that same day.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Actually, Pinbuster, Roventini shot his on a league night with 5-man teams on each lane. You may be thinking of Vince W. with the singles tourney. Tony was the only lefty on the team (which shot 36?? scratch I believe) that night, although I don't know who was on the opposing team.

El-Duce
 
Actually Vince Wood did it in a league, not a singles tournament. They bowling alley he shot it at is about 10 minutes away from me, and I cannot remember if it was a 4 or 5 man teams.
--------------------
B-Car