win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: track vs columbia  (Read 803 times)

Dabalos

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
track vs columbia
« on: August 24, 2004, 06:22:36 AM »
Do they share any coverstocks or cores?  if so which balls?

 

Rock77

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3621
Re: track vs columbia
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2004, 05:16:52 PM »
Track does not share its morpheus cores with anyone. Other cores aside from the morpheus line have been used in past AMF and Columbia balls. As for the coverstocks. I dont think they "share" covers but maybe each have a modified version of a particular cover that they call their own.
--------------------
I just close my eyes and throw the ball

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: track vs columbia
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2004, 05:51:01 PM »
Track's initial charter was to test covers and cores for use in their and in Columbia's balls. To what degree this INITIAL charter is still in effect is problematic at best.

Things like the Enhanced Super-Flex cover was initially tested in the VooDoo and has since been used in many Columbia balls. The "Bigfoot" coverstock used in balls like the EZ Money and the Mojo became the Muscle and th eMuscle GT coverstock in many Columbia balls (first used in the Icon, Icon2, and Icon300)
--------------------
"We get old too fast, and too late, smart."


Edited on 8/24/2004 5:53 PM
"None are so blind as those who will not see."