Storm accepted the results and cried uncle so they would stop testing. Besides people going to OC, which is about 50k out of 2 million, this has very little effect on the average USBC member.
From what I'm hearing from people who actually know the particulars of what went on, I think that description is very ... simplistic.
For starters, the language the USBC used in its release may not match up to what Storm actually told them, or what Storm actually did. We definitely got the USBC's perspective on it, but did we actually get the truth?
As for trying to gauge how many are affected -- and it's not 2 million, the USBC's own financials put the max number at 1.4 million (which was almost 2 years ago now) and there has been a 6-10% bleed-off per year since then, so the real number is closer to 1.2 million now -- that's not what you need to be looking at. You need to consider whether the organization is doing what's in the best interest of its members. There are people in my local leagues who do not bowl Nationals who are very upset, in part because some tournaments are opting in to the USBC's ruling. But it goes even deeper than that: If the organization is not acting in an above-board way, it doesn't matter how many are or aren't affected. It matters whether the organization can be trusted.
You apparently believe it can be, while I'm not so sure. I was listening to a podcast the other night where one of the people on the podcast was reporting a couple of leagues in their area were going unsanctioned next year as a direct result of this. The USBC should be doing whatever it can do to GROW the sport. This does not grow it.