I don't disagree with any of that.
What I am trying to say, is that if bowling was accepted through Corporate America, there would be the money there to have young people want to get involved. In order to get Corporate America involved, you need to offer a product that the layman would see as superior and better than what they see at the local level. It needs to be identifiable, without explanation. You simply can't just alienate generations of bowlers as well as the majority for a select few who can throw it a certain way, and expect to be successful on a global scale. There is a big difference between accepting two handed bowling and ultra high rev rates, and promoting it. We have crossed that line in the industry. Imagine if we had promoted Bob Vespi over a David Ozio or a Brian Voss, and created clinics to teach it.
Randy Pedersen all but shamed the "shot makers" on the masters telecast. It was very disrespectful, and a true measure of what this game has become. Basically, If you don't have a High Rev rate, you are nothing. Some of your comments earlier in this thread also Echo those remarks.
