I keep thinking about this. What do you think?
Why can't the USBC have their own specific patterns for sport conditions? Like say they had 5 or 6 patterns like the PBA and called them a specific thing and specified exactly what they were. The criticism that I keep reading about sport conditions is that it is too open to interpretation and a lot of people do not think that sport conditions are the answer.
Well, what if USBC sanctioned leagues had to use a pattern? Like say, we are using USBC Sport Pattern 2 for this tournament. Or... Our league rotates between USBC Sport Patterns 1 - 3 or something like that.
My first thought would be to say that everyone should use the PBA oil conditions which would unify the sport, but if you have to pay the PBA licensing fees to use them then that is never going to happen. So what if the official governing body had specific patterns like the PBA? Then what if that all USBC sanctioned events had to use these patterns?
I don't know about the politics of bowling, but it seems like this would be the best way to do it. You need something like what the PBA is doing but for non-PBA events.
Other theories I've heard is going with one sanctioned ball, but that would hurt all of the ball manufacturers. Another thing I heard was to increase pin weight, but then the bowling centers would have to absorb that cost and they can't/won't pay for it.
--------------------
Current Arsenal:
Geddy Lee
Of salesmen!