win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Walter Ray vs No Thumb  (Read 9889 times)

TotallyBowling

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« on: August 06, 2012, 05:51:38 PM »
I was having a pretty in depth debate during our end of league meeting with our league secretary about what would be the best way to throw the ball nowadays. We used the example of Walter Ray vs No Thumb.

I said that based on longevity and winning, I would still want to throw like Walter Ray. James said that he would probably want to throw no-thumb, or more likely two handed, since the modern scoring pace seemed to benefit that kind of release.

Just wondered what everyone else thought, and what you would pick?


 

Coach Bonesaw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 243
  • Go Sarge Easter
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2012, 06:00:21 PM »
Walter Ray. I don't know why this is even a debate.
In the bag:

Roto Grip Magic Gem
Motiv Primal Shock
Hammer Ocean Vibe

raidernation34

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2012, 06:02:01 PM »
Walter Ray... you can always throw down the ten board and the core alone will bring the ball to the pocket.

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2012, 06:07:40 PM »
Yeah... win over $4 million in a career, or rev the piss out of it. I'll take Walter any day of the week, and twice on Sunday.

Track_Fanatic

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 975
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2012, 06:47:15 PM »
WRW Jr. has bowled no thumb too.  Just not competitively I heard.  I think when he was on TV awhile back and he threw 1 shot two handed.  That was after the match had already been decided. I could be wrong(wouldn't be the first time.) lol. 

900DJ

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #5 on: August 06, 2012, 06:55:08 PM »
Given we don't know the physical longevity of the two handed style bowlers yet, WRW all the way! 

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8157
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #6 on: August 06, 2012, 08:05:50 PM »
I agree, Walter Ray.

 
_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

JOE FALCO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6298
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #7 on: August 06, 2012, 08:18:14 PM »
I hate to differ from all those that responded so far .. but .. if I could throw as accurately as Belmonte I'd prefer his style. In the next few years I think Belmonte will be winning quite a bit ..
RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones!

Russell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #8 on: August 06, 2012, 10:07:17 PM »
I hate to differ from all those that responded so far .. but .. if I could throw as accurately as Belmonte I'd prefer his style. In the next few years I think Belmonte will be winning quite a bit ..

I am thinking that people thought this about Tommy Jones too....not knocking your logic...but this is dependent on his body holding up...which history shows it won't do into his 40s and 50s.

Russell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #9 on: August 06, 2012, 10:08:12 PM »
Walter Ray... you can always throw down the ten board and the core alone will bring the ball to the pocket.

What?...how does this happen?

batbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #10 on: August 06, 2012, 10:13:05 PM »
Walter Ray!!! Belmonte has a ton of revs, but I opt for longevity!!!
Bruce Campbell
Coaches aren't born, they are made!
USBC Silver Certified Coach
          
www.rotogrip.com
www.stormbowling.com
www.radicalbowling.com
www.damngoodbowling.com

Changing bowling, one bowler at a time!

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #11 on: August 06, 2012, 10:20:02 PM »
Don't get me wrong. Belmonte throws it well with one hand, but the 2 hands thing, when he gets older, is going to be rough.

Tripcee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #12 on: August 07, 2012, 12:44:34 AM »
I figure the amount of torque going across Belmo's body has to be taking more of a toll on his back than anything. So WRW all the way.
In the Bag:
Seismic Evo Hybrid
Seismic Evo Pearl
Seismic LynX
Seismic Axion

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #13 on: August 07, 2012, 04:34:02 AM »
WRWJr for sure. He doesn't throw the ball just one way. Very few pros do. His style and ability is the reason he can play any lane condition, inside or out, and score. That says it all for me. Same for players like Norm Duke. That is why they are so competitive for so long on so many different conditions.

Belmo is a pro no doubt. I laughed when bowling on ESPN was hyping Belmo and interviewing all the pros and PDW and others were saying how this is the new revolution of bowling. Well it has yet to develop and I think it will be another niche in bowling just like the style it copies of using no thumb and one arm to bowl.
« Last Edit: August 07, 2012, 04:37:58 AM by kidlost2000 »
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Rightycomplex

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1250
Re: Walter Ray vs No Thumb
« Reply #14 on: August 07, 2012, 07:06:42 AM »
Line wise, WRW. Stylewise, neither. Both are freaks of nature, mutants, one of a kind and it would take the average joe shmoe a lot of practice and coaching to be able to accurately repeat shots using those styles. Not that its impossible, just hard to do.
James C. Jones
Orbdrillers Pro Shop Holiday Bowl
Chester, Va.

Hammer Regional/Amateur Staff Member

www.facebook.com/orbdrillers
Orbdrillers.com
Hammerbowling.com