win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Lane surface friction  (Read 1006 times)

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Lane surface friction
« on: November 30, 2004, 08:14:12 AM »
I recollect hearing or reading somewhere that the surface of wood lanes eventually brings most bowling balls to a surface grit of roughly 600. Is that correct? If yes, would the same apply to synthetic lane surfaces? My gut feeling is that synthetic lanes have less friction than wood lanes - all things being equal.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

 

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #1 on: November 30, 2004, 05:34:52 PM »
New synthetics CAN have less friction than wood lanes. Old worn, synthetics tear up a ball just like old worn OR unprotected wood lanes, eventually. Some proprietors are so STUPID they use less and less oil on newly installed synthetics, then proceed to watch their investment go up in smoke or up in particles ... Sigh.

Yes, Bob Summerville, in my bowling education, first postulated that balls will eventually go to 600 - 800 grit matte finish, if not re-polished or otherwise maintained. (Yes, others may have stated this somewhere else before Bob did, but I first learned of it reading BTM, while he was still alive.)
--------------------
"When we choose an action,
we also choose the consequences of that action.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2004, 01:17:07 AM »
Thanks Charlest,

Do you remember in which issue of BTM the late Bob Summerville made his postulation? Perhaps I can order a copy from BTM. The question about lane surface friction has come up as we are preparing for a new training course for bowling coaches here in Sweden.

Again, it is my experience that a polished ball stays shiny much longer if used only on well-maintained synthetic lanes. My gut feeling is that a dull ball would stay dull longer on a well-kept synthetic lane than on a wood ditto. I just wish I could find something somewhere to support or refute this claim.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #3 on: December 01, 2004, 02:29:54 AM »
Sorry, jensm, I don't recall the first issue in which he said that. He did say it in several of them.

Also, even dull ball, like those finished at 400 grit, like the Goliath, are supposed to eventually smooth out to 600 - 800 grit. So they also should be maintained with sandpaper or nylon pads.
--------------------
"When we choose an action,
we also choose the consequences of that action.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #4 on: December 01, 2004, 12:49:52 PM »
Thanks again, charlest! I e-mailed my question to BTM directly. Hopefully they'll reply sometime.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #5 on: December 01, 2004, 12:55:01 PM »
jensm--There was a BTM article written this year about the difference in surface hardness of wood, syntehtic and Guardian overlay lanes.  I'll look up the month and post the date here when I get home....few hours from now.

charlest and I do believe in keeping BTM's copyright infringement intact.  I try to refrain from posting verbatim data from BTM for that reason.  

Scott
Scott

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #6 on: December 01, 2004, 03:30:24 PM »
Thanks guys! A recent article covering wood, synthetics and overlays sounds like just what I'm looking for.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm

scotts33

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #7 on: December 01, 2004, 03:57:30 PM »
jensm--Checked when I got home.  The article I was thinking of doesn't really go into exactly what you are looking for but it's an article in March 2004 by Mo Pinel that goes over the difference in Sward hardness of different lane surfaces.  He gives numbers in that article.  

Article is "How to Conquer the Modern Bowling Enviornment".  It's a comparison of some High Roller/Eliminator tourney lane condtions and how the surfaces interact with these conditions.

Scott
Scott

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: Lane surface friction
« Reply #8 on: December 01, 2004, 05:14:29 PM »
Many thanks, Scott! Ï'll probably wind up back ordering this from BTM directly.

--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm