It seems that the responses seem to be pretty one sided. Analogous cases are not exactly what I am looking for in this instance because like all other cases, analogies don't prove anything, they seek to explain. Golf is a great way to make explanations of bowling, but they don't PROVE anything. Analogies are by definition arguing outside of what is present. Bowling and golf are not the same. They never will be. And managing isn't the same as coaching which isn't the same as drilling a bowling ball which obviously isn't the same as throwing a bowling ball.
My original question/quandry had to do with the relationship between drilling and throwing a bowling ball, not between coaching and drilling, nor between coaching and playing. Those are separate topics tangentially related by the sport/activity in question.
What is at the heart of what I am asking or contemplating is whether or not someone who is drilling my ball should have the ability to do what I seek to do. And what I come to after sifting through the analogies is that knowledge is different than execution. And I knew that. But that does not take away the sour taste of knowing that the one seeking to do something for you would not be able to do what they say YOU should be able to do. What it comes down to is a strict reliance on the pro shop operators knowledge based on observation but not personally. I would like to see the guy I'm getting a ball drilled from be able throw the ball over a bunch of arrows. If I'm buying a ball that I want to swing 40 out to 1 I want him to at least be able to swing it 25 out to 5. Otherwise we would have to rely entirely on the numbers that companies give. And I find more and more as I read on this board that bowling balls are subjective in terms of personal experience. Bowling balls are not objective numbered rocks that go X boards on X pattern. It just doesn't work that way, which is why reasonable minds differ when it comes to expensive equipment. Some people like the Fear Factor, some people hate it. Why? Because of the subjective evaluation. And if a pro-shop operator were not able to give me a reasonable subjective evaluation of a product due to an inability to use the equipment properly, then perhaps I would not want to buy it from him.
So to answer some good posts, I don't think there is a complete break between knowledge and execution WHEN IT COMES TO BOWLING BALLS. Now that still leaves room for buying from people who don't throw it very well if I were to abandon the criteria I hold that the person be able to offer me a reasonable subjective evaluation. I can get the objective stuff by reading about RGs and Diffs, but when I pay the extra to go to a proshop operator I want their opinion of how the stuff works.
I think the analogies are getting a bit ridiculous. They aren't even very similar. Maybe I'm just being anal, but a basic argumentative or persuasive point is not to compare it to something vaguely similar and then argue from that perspective. Thanks for the responses.
CCB
--------------------
I bowl at country club bowl...not a very inventive name now is it.
Edited on 1/17/2004 5:07 AM